6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

THE NEAR FIELD OF DIPOLE ANTENNAS PART 1 THEORY

Bioeffects Seen

Q. Balzano, O. Garay, K. Siwiak

Share:

The paper develops a cylindrical-wave method to compute dipole near fields and finds common formulas can be inaccurate close to the antenna.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers expressed dipole near fields using cylindrical waves for closed-form integration. They found commonly used near-field formulas can give incorrect values.

Finding

Results have shown that commonly used formulas for evaluating near field intensity in proximity of dipole antennas can give incorrect values.

In their words

“Results have shown that commonly used formulas for evaluating near field intensity in proximity of dipole antennas can give incorrect values.”
Cite This Study
Q. Balzano, O. Garay, K. Siwiak (n.d.). THE NEAR FIELD OF DIPOLE ANTENNAS PART 1 THEORY.
Show BibTeX
@article{the_near_field_of_dipole_antennas_part_1_theory_g4660,
  author = {Q. Balzano and O. Garay and K. Siwiak},
  title = {THE NEAR FIELD OF DIPOLE ANTENNAS PART 1 THEORY},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

They expressed the fields in terms of cylindrical waves, which allow closed-form integration.
Commonly used formulas for evaluating near-field intensity can give incorrect values close to the antenna.
More than 1500 harmonics were needed to satisfactorily match the boundary conditions on the conductor surface.