6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

The Ocular Lens and Cataract

Bioeffects Seen

Sol M. Michaelson, Sandra W. Magin · 1975

Share:

1975 review found microwaves produced cataracts in rabbits only through acute thermal insult at 100-150 mW/cm² for 60-100 minutes, and no proven human cases exist.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1975 conference paper by Michaelson and Magin reviewed experimental and clinical evidence on microwave exposure and cataract development in the eye's lens. In rabbits, acute thermal insult from high-intensity microwave fields (100-150 mW/cm² for 60-100 minutes) was cataractogenic if intraocular temperatures reached 45-55°C, and no proven cases of human cataracts caused by microwave radiation exist.

Why This Matters

Michaelson's 1975 review notes that of all the real or alleged effects of microwave exposure in man in the Western Hemisphere, cataract production appears to have created the greatest interest and has become the most confusing and controversial. It reports that no cumulative effect was observed from repeated sub-threshold exposures, and that no cataracts were produced by 100 mW/cm² for 2 hours/day for 8-9 days.

There is no clinical or experimental evidence that lens damage due to microwave energy is morphologically different from lens abnormalities from other causes, including aging. Studies at 918 MHz and 3000 MHz showed no evidence of cataract formation at tested power densities.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

diagramPage 2 - Figure 1: Anatomy of the Eye
diagramPage 4 - AI-described figure: Figure 2: Crystalline lens showing various anatomical structures such as the cortex, nucleus, zonular lamella, and anterior capsule.
diagramPage 8 - AI-described figure: Figure 3 illustrates a cross-sectional diagram of an eye structure with labeled parts such as posterior subcapsular, posterior cortical, lamellar, nuclear, and coronary.

Exposure Details

Power Density
100 mW/cm²
Exposure Duration
2 hours/day for 8-9 days

Exposure Context

This study used 100 mW/cm² for radio frequency:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 100 mW/cm²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)This level is 100 times the FCC limit
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 918 MHz to 3000 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 918 MHz to 3000 MHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

To analyze the relationship between microwave exposure and cataract development, examining both experimental and clinical evidence to determine if microwave radiation causes distinct lens damage.

Review of experimental studies on microwave-induced cataracts in animals (particularly rabbits) and ...

Experimental studies in rabbits showed that acute thermal insult from high-intensity microwave field...

There is no clinical or experimental evidence that lens damage due to microwave energy is morphologically different from lens abnormalities from other causes, including aging. The idea that there is a microwave radiation signature on the lens has little support from evidence. No proven cases of human cataracts caused by microwave radiation exist.

Cite This Study
Sol M. Michaelson, Sandra W. Magin (1975). The Ocular Lens and Cataract.
Show BibTeX
@article{the_ocular_lens_and_cataract_g3722,
  author = {Sol M. Michaelson and Sandra W. Magin},
  title = {The Ocular Lens and Cataract},
  year = {1975},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Acute thermal insult from high-intensity microwave fields (100-150 mW/cm² for 60-100 minutes) was cataractogenic in rabbits if intraocular temperatures reached 45-55°C. Single potentially cataractogenic exposures did not injure eyes under conditions of controlled general hypothermia.
Studies at 918 MHz and 3000 MHz showed no evidence of cataract formation at tested power densities.
There is no clinical or experimental evidence that lens damage due to microwave energy is morphologically different from lens abnormalities from other causes, including aging. The idea that there is a microwave radiation signature on the lens has little support from evidence.
No cumulative effect was observed from repeated sub-threshold exposures. No cataracts were produced by 100 mW/cm² for 2 hours/day for 8-9 days.
No proven cases of human cataracts caused by microwave radiation exist.