8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

THE PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CURRENTS OF VERY HIGH FREQUENCY (135,000,000 TO 3,300,000 CYCLES PER SECOND)

Bioeffects Seen

J. W. Schereschewsky · 1926

Share:

Scientists were documenting biological effects from radiofrequency fields nearly 100 years ago using primitive equipment.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1926 study by Schereschewsky examined the physiological effects of very high frequency currents on laboratory animals using vacuum tube oscillator technology. The research represents one of the earliest scientific investigations into how radiofrequency electromagnetic fields affect biological systems. This pioneering work laid groundwork for understanding EMF health effects nearly a century before widespread wireless technology adoption.

Why This Matters

This research holds remarkable significance as one of the first documented studies examining radiofrequency effects on living organisms. In 1926, Schereschewsky was investigating biological impacts of high frequency currents when radio broadcasting was still in its infancy and most homes had no electrical appliances. The fact that researchers nearly 100 years ago were already documenting physiological effects from RF exposure should give us pause about today's exponentially higher exposure levels.

What makes this study particularly relevant is the technology gap. The vacuum tube oscillators used in 1926 produced far weaker fields than today's cell phones, WiFi routers, and 5G networks that bombard us 24/7. If researchers could detect measurable physiological changes with primitive 1920s equipment, the implications for our current high-intensity, multi-frequency electromagnetic environment deserve serious consideration from health authorities who continue to dismiss EMF concerns.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

diagramPage 3 - AI-described figure: A schematic diagram illustrating a circuit with labeled components such as RFC (Radio Frequency Choke), L (inductor), C (capacitor), and resistors.
diagramPage 6 - Circuit diagram of oscillator No. 3 (Hartley circuit)
diagramPage 7 - AI-described figure: A diagram showing two oscillators (No.1 and No.2) with their respective ranges in cycles.
diagramPage 8 - AI-described figure: A diagram illustrating an oscillator circuit with labeled components such as 'Grid', 'Plate', and 'Filament'.
diagramPage 9 - Auxiliary-coupled circuit showing mouse holder, thermocouple, and microammeter

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 7.25 to 135 million cycles per second exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 7.25 to 135 million cycles per secondPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study. Duration: Variable time until death, typically within minutes

Study Details

To investigate the physiological effects of high-frequency currents on laboratory animals, particularly examining the lethality and symptoms associated with exposure at various frequencies.

Laboratory mice (19-22 grams) were exposed to high-frequency oscillating fields between condenser pl...

Death occurred within minutes of exposure to high-frequency currents. Symptoms included agitation, c...

High-frequency currents cause severe physiological effects in laboratory animals, with lethality varying significantly with frequency. The effects are most pronounced in a frequency band from 66 to 18.3 million cycles per second. The mechanism appears to involve more than simple heating, possibly including dielectric loss, hysteresis, or mechanical vibrations of tissue cells. This frequency band of electromagnetic radiation has not been extensively studied in its effects on living cells.

Cite This Study
J. W. Schereschewsky (1926). THE PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CURRENTS OF VERY HIGH FREQUENCY (135,000,000 TO 3,300,000 CYCLES PER SECOND).
Show BibTeX
@article{the_physiological_effects_of_currents_of_very_high_frequency_135_000_000_to_3_30_g6777,
  author = {J. W. Schereschewsky},
  title = {THE PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CURRENTS OF VERY HIGH FREQUENCY (135,000,000 TO 3,300,000 CYCLES PER SECOND)},
  year = {1926},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Researchers used vacuum tube oscillators to generate very high frequency currents for testing on laboratory animals. This primitive 1920s technology produced much weaker electromagnetic fields than modern wireless devices.
This early research documented physiological effects using weak RF fields from basic equipment, suggesting modern high-intensity wireless technology deserves careful health evaluation given exponentially stronger exposures.
The study examined laboratory animals exposed to very high frequency currents, though specific species aren't detailed in available records. This represented pioneering biological research into electromagnetic field effects.
The vacuum tube oscillators used in 1926 produced far weaker electromagnetic fields than modern cell phones, WiFi, and wireless networks that now expose us continuously at much higher intensities.
Yes, Schereschewsky's 1926 research represents one of the earliest documented scientific investigations into how radiofrequency electromagnetic fields affect living biological systems and physiological processes.