8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

The 'Specific Action' of Ultra-short Wireless Waves

Bioeffects Seen

Prof. W. E. Curtis, F.R.S., Dr. F. Dickens, and S. F. Evans · 1936

Share:

Scientists identified specific biological effects from wireless radiation as early as 1936, nearly a century before smartphones.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1936 research by Curtis examined the specific biological effects of ultra-short wireless waves, representing one of the earliest scientific investigations into radiofrequency radiation's impact on living systems. The study explored how these short-wave radio transmissions might produce distinct biological responses, laying groundwork for decades of EMF health research that followed.

Why This Matters

What makes this 1936 study remarkable is its timing. Curtis was investigating the biological effects of wireless waves just as radio broadcasting was becoming widespread, decades before anyone imagined cell phones or WiFi. The science demonstrates remarkable foresight in recognizing that these 'ultra-short' radio waves might have specific biological actions worth studying. This early research represents the beginning of what would become a vast body of evidence showing that radiofrequency radiation isn't biologically inert. The reality is that scientists have been documenting biological effects from wireless radiation for nearly a century, yet we're still debating whether modern devices are safe. What this means for you is that concerns about EMF health effects aren't new or unfounded. They're rooted in scientific observations that date back to the very beginning of our wireless age.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Prof. W. E. Curtis, F.R.S., Dr. F. Dickens, and S. F. Evans (1936). The 'Specific Action' of Ultra-short Wireless Waves.
Show BibTeX
@article{the_specific_action_of_ultra_short_wireless_waves_g5847,
  author = {Prof. W. E. Curtis and F.R.S. and Dr. F. Dickens and and S. F. Evans},
  title = {The 'Specific Action' of Ultra-short Wireless Waves},
  year = {1936},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Ultra-short wireless waves in 1936 referred to radio frequencies used for early broadcasting and communication, typically in the shortwave radio spectrum. These were among the first widespread wireless technologies studied for biological effects.
Curtis recognized early that wireless waves might have specific biological actions on living systems. This pioneering research occurred as radio broadcasting expanded, showing scientific awareness of potential health effects decades before modern wireless devices.
This study represents the foundation of EMF health research, establishing that scientists have been documenting biological effects from wireless radiation for nearly 90 years. It shows current EMF health concerns have deep historical roots.
While specific findings aren't detailed, Curtis examined how ultra-short wireless waves produced distinct biological responses in living systems, focusing on the concept that these waves had measurable, specific effects rather than being biologically neutral.
Yes, scientists like Curtis were already investigating potential biological effects of wireless radiation in the 1930s, demonstrating that health concerns about radiofrequency exposure began almost immediately with widespread wireless technology adoption.