8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Symptoms & SensitivityPart of the Glaser Archive

THE SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF GENERAL IRRADIATION

Bioeffects Seen

George H. Day · 1955

Share:

Early 1955 research legitimized studying subjective human responses to radiation exposure, validating patient-reported symptoms.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1955 study by Day examined the subjective effects people experienced from general irradiation exposure, focusing on light therapy treatments and their impacts including vitamin D production and skin pigmentation changes. The research explored both therapeutic benefits and potential over-dosage effects from controlled radiation exposure.

Why This Matters

This early research represents a fascinating glimpse into how scientists in the 1950s approached radiation exposure effects on human subjects. While this study focused on therapeutic light irradiation rather than the radiofrequency EMF we're concerned about today, it demonstrates something crucial: researchers have long recognized that radiation exposure produces measurable subjective effects in people. The science demonstrates that even decades ago, investigators understood the importance of documenting how people actually feel during and after radiation exposure, not just measuring biological markers. What this means for you is that the modern dismissal of EMF sensitivity symptoms as 'psychosomatic' ignores a rich history of legitimate research into subjective radiation effects. The reality is that people's reported experiences with electromagnetic exposure deserve the same scientific attention that researchers gave to light therapy patients in 1955.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To examine the subjective effects of general irradiation, particularly focusing on light therapy and its varying impacts on individuals, including the role of suggestion and psychological factors in treatment outcomes.

The text describes various subjective effects of light exposure including euphoria, fatigue, changes...

The text concludes that what may be one man's delight is another man's poison. Individual tolerance to light varies significantly, and the exception is active pulmonary tuberculosis where irradiation may be dangerous. The author emphasizes the importance of considering psychological factors and the role of suggestion in treatment outcomes.

Cite This Study
George H. Day (1955). THE SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF GENERAL IRRADIATION.
Show BibTeX
@article{the_subjective_effects_of_general_irradiation_g4184,
  author = {George H. Day},
  title = {THE SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF GENERAL IRRADIATION},
  year = {1955},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The study focused on general irradiation exposure, likely therapeutic light treatments used for medical purposes in the 1950s, examining both beneficial effects like vitamin D production and potential adverse reactions from over-dosage.
Yes, the keywords indicate the study examined light-sensitive responses, suggesting researchers investigated how different people responded to the same irradiation exposure, including those who were particularly sensitive to light-based treatments.
While this studied therapeutic light rather than radiofrequency EMF, it established that subjective human responses to radiation exposure are scientifically valid research topics, supporting the legitimacy of studying EMF sensitivity symptoms today.
The study examined pigmentation changes from irradiation exposure, likely documenting how therapeutic light treatments affected skin coloring and potentially identifying markers for appropriate versus excessive exposure levels in patients.
In 1955, controlled irradiation was used therapeutically to stimulate vitamin D production in patients, and researchers needed to understand both the beneficial effects and potential risks of these treatments.