8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Trošić I, Mataušić-Pišl M, Pavičić I, Marjanović AM

No Effects Found

Authors not listed · 2013

Share:

Two-week 915 MHz exposure showed no sperm damage in rats, but study duration may be too short for meaningful conclusions.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Croatian researchers exposed 18 male rats to 915 MHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to older cell phones) for one hour daily over two weeks to study effects on reproductive health. They found no statistically significant changes in testicular structure, sperm count, sperm mobility, or sperm shape compared to unexposed control rats. The study concluded that short-term intermittent RF exposure at these levels does not harm male reproductive function in rats.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 915 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 915 MHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale
Cite This Study
Unknown (2013). Trošić I, Mataušić-Pišl M, Pavičić I, Marjanović AM.
Show BibTeX
@article{troi_i_mataui_pil_m_pavii_i_marjanovi_am_ce3889,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Trošić I, Mataušić-Pišl M, Pavičić I, Marjanović AM},
  year = {2013},
  doi = {10.2478/10004-1254-64-2013-2394},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

This study found no significant changes in sperm count, mobility, or shape after exposing rats to 915 MHz radiation for one hour daily over two weeks. However, the exposure duration may have been too short to detect reproductive effects.
915 MHz represents older cell phone technology. Modern smartphones primarily use higher frequencies between 1.8-2.4 GHz, with 5G networks extending even higher. The biological effects may differ significantly at these higher frequencies.
The 0.6 W/kg SAR used falls within current safety limits but represents whole-body exposure. Real-world exposure from phones is typically localized, with higher SAR levels concentrated near the device placement area.
Sperm development takes approximately 74 days in rats and about 64 days in humans. Two weeks of exposure may not capture the full cycle of sperm production and maturation processes.
Animal studies provide valuable preliminary data, but human exposure patterns are typically continuous and lifelong rather than intermittent. Longer-term studies with realistic exposure scenarios are needed for meaningful risk assessment.