3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Ets1 oncogene induction by ELF-modulated 50 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field

Bioeffects Seen

Romano-Spica V, Mucci N, Ursini CL, Ianni A, Bhat NK · 2000

View Original Abstract
Share:

Modulated radiofrequency fields activated cancer-promoting genes in human cells, but only with specific low-frequency pulsing patterns.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Italian researchers exposed blood and reproductive cells to radiofrequency radiation (50 MHz) combined with extremely low frequency modulation (16 Hz) to study effects on gene activity. They found that this specific combination activated the ets1 gene, which is associated with cancer development, but only when the low-frequency modulation was present. This suggests that the pulsing or modulation of RF signals may be more biologically active than continuous exposure.

Why This Matters

This study reveals a concerning mechanism by which modulated radiofrequency fields can activate oncogenes (cancer-promoting genes) in human cells. The researchers specifically chose exposure conditions that would interfere with calcium ion flow in cells, and found that the 16 Hz modulation was critical for the effect. What makes this particularly relevant is that many wireless devices use pulsed or modulated signals rather than continuous waves. The exposure levels used (0.2 microT magnetic field, 60 V/m electric field) are within ranges that can occur near wireless devices, though the specific frequency and modulation combination differs from most consumer electronics. The reality is that this research adds to a growing body of evidence showing that EMF effects on cells depend not just on power levels, but on the specific characteristics of the signal including frequency, modulation, and timing.

Exposure Details

Magnetic Field
0.0002, 0.0457 mG
Electric Field
60 V/m
Source/Device
50 MHz

Exposure Context

This study used 60 V/m for electric fields:

This study used 0.0002, 0.0457 mG for magnetic fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0.0002, 0.0457 mGExtreme Concern5 mGFCC Limit2,000 mGEffects observed in the No Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 10,000,000x higher than this exposure level

Study Details

We have analyzed gene expression in hemopoietic and testicular cell types after their exposure to 50 MHz radiofrequency (RF) non-ionizing radiation modulated (80%) with a 16 Hz frequency.

The exposure system generates a 0.2 microT magnetic field parallel to the ground and a 60 V/m electr...

Under these electromagnetic field (EMF) conditions, we observed an overexpression of the ets1 mRNA ...

The experimental model described in this paper may contribute to the understanding of the biological mechanisms involved in EMF effects.

Cite This Study
Romano-Spica V, Mucci N, Ursini CL, Ianni A, Bhat NK (2000). Ets1 oncogene induction by ELF-modulated 50 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field Bioelectromagnetics 21(1):8-18, 2000.
Show BibTeX
@article{v_2000_ets1_oncogene_induction_by_1298,
  author = {Romano-Spica V and Mucci N and Ursini CL and Ianni A and Bhat NK},
  title = {Ets1 oncogene induction by ELF-modulated 50 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field},
  year = {2000},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10615087/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Italian researchers exposed blood and reproductive cells to radiofrequency radiation (50 MHz) combined with extremely low frequency modulation (16 Hz) to study effects on gene activity. They found that this specific combination activated the ets1 gene, which is associated with cancer development, but only when the low-frequency modulation was present. This suggests that the pulsing or modulation of RF signals may be more biologically active than continuous exposure.