3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Evaluating the combinative effects on human lymphocyte DNA damage induced by ultraviolet ray C plus 1.8GHz microwaves using comet assay in vitro.

Bioeffects Seen

Baohong W, Lifen J, Lanjuan L, Jianlin L, Deqiang L, Wei Z, Jiliang H. · 2007

View Original Abstract
Share:

Microwave radiation may not directly damage DNA but can disrupt cellular repair processes when combined with other stressors.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Chinese researchers exposed human immune cells to 1.8 GHz microwave radiation and UV light. Microwaves alone caused no DNA damage, but when combined with UV, they disrupted normal DNA repair - initially reducing damage then increasing it hours later, suggesting unpredictable interference with cellular repair mechanisms.

Why This Matters

This study reveals something concerning about how microwave radiation interacts with other environmental stressors at the cellular level. While 1.8 GHz radiation alone didn't cause DNA damage at a SAR of 3 W/kg (similar to what you'd experience during a long phone call), it clearly altered how cells responded to UV damage over time. The fact that microwaves initially seemed protective but later became harmful suggests they may be disrupting normal cellular repair mechanisms. This type of interaction effect is particularly troubling because we're constantly exposed to multiple stressors in our environment. The science demonstrates that EMF effects aren't always straightforward - sometimes the real danger lies in how these fields interfere with our body's ability to handle other challenges.

Exposure Details

SAR
3 W/kg
Source/Device
1.8 GHz
Exposure Duration
0, 1.5 and 4 h

Exposure Context

This study used 3 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 3 W/kgExtreme Concern0.1 W/kgFCC Limit1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 1x higher than this exposure level

Study Details

The objective of this study was to observe whether 1.8 GHz microwaves (MW) (SAR, 3 W/kg) exposure can influence human lymphocyte DNA damage induced by ultraviolet ray C (UVC).

The lymphocytes, which were from three young healthy donors, were exposed to 254nm UVC at the doses ...

The results indicated that the difference of DNA damage induced between MW group and control group w...

In this experiment it was found that 1.8 GHz (SAR, 3 W/kg) MW exposure for 1.5 and 4 h did not enhance significantly human lymphocyte DNA damage, but could reduce and increase DNA damage of human lymphocytes induced by UVC at 1.5-h and 4-h incubation, respectively.

Cite This Study
Baohong W, Lifen J, Lanjuan L, Jianlin L, Deqiang L, Wei Z, Jiliang H. (2007). Evaluating the combinative effects on human lymphocyte DNA damage induced by ultraviolet ray C plus 1.8GHz microwaves using comet assay in vitro. Toxicology. 232(3):311-316, 2007.
Show BibTeX
@article{w_2007_evaluating_the_combinative_effects_743,
  author = {Baohong W and Lifen J and Lanjuan L and Jianlin L and Deqiang L and Wei Z and Jiliang H.},
  title = {Evaluating the combinative effects on human lymphocyte DNA damage induced by ultraviolet ray C plus 1.8GHz microwaves using comet assay in vitro.},
  year = {2007},
  
  url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300483X07000601},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Chinese researchers exposed human immune cells to 1.8 GHz microwave radiation and UV light. Microwaves alone caused no DNA damage, but when combined with UV, they disrupted normal DNA repair - initially reducing damage then increasing it hours later, suggesting unpredictable interference with cellular repair mechanisms.