Whole Body / General311 citations
The Impact of 9.375 GHz Microwave Radiation on the Emotional and Cognitive Abilities of Mice
Bioeffects Seen
Wang X, Zhao X, Xu J, Li M, Sun B, Gao A, Zhang L, Wu S, Liu X, Zou D, Li Z, Dong G, Zhang C, Wang C · 2025
Insufficient information to determine key finding.
Plain English Summary
Summary written for general audiences
Insufficient information provided. The study title indicates an examination of 9.375 GHz microwave radiation effects on emotional and cognitive abilities in mice, but no abstract or findings data was provided to generate an accurate summary.
Why This Matters
The study appears to investigate potential neurobehavioral effects of microwave frequency EMF exposure in an animal model. Without access to the abstract or results, the specific methodology, exposure parameters, and outcomes cannot be assessed.
Exposure Information
Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.
Cite This Study
Wang X, Zhao X, Xu J, Li M, Sun B, Gao A, Zhang L, Wu S, Liu X, Zou D, Li Z, Dong G, Zhang C, Wang C (2025). The Impact of 9.375 GHz Microwave Radiation on the Emotional and Cognitive Abilities of Mice.
Show BibTeX
@article{wang_x_zhao_x_xu_j_li_m_sun_b_gao_a_zhang_l_wu_s_liu_x_zou_d_li_z_dong_g_zhang_c_wang_c_ce2638,
author = {Wang X and Zhao X and Xu J and Li M and Sun B and Gao A and Zhang L and Wu S and Liu X and Zou D and Li Z and Dong G and Zhang C and Wang C},
title = {The Impact of 9.375 GHz Microwave Radiation on the Emotional and Cognitive Abilities of Mice},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1038/s41586-025-09962-4},
}Quick Questions About This Study
Humanity's Last Exam contains 2,500 questions spanning dozens of academic subjects including mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences. Each question requires expert-level knowledge and has unambiguous, verifiable answers that cannot be quickly found through internet searches.
Unlike existing benchmarks where AI achieves over 90% accuracy, HLE is designed at the frontier of human expert knowledge. It uses multi-modal questions requiring deep understanding rather than pattern recognition, revealing significant gaps in current AI capabilities.
State-of-the-art large language models demonstrated low accuracy and poor calibration on HLE questions. This poor performance highlights a marked gap between current AI capabilities and expert human knowledge in closed-ended academic domains.
Popular AI benchmarks have become too easy, with models achieving over 90% accuracy on tests like Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding. HLE was created to provide meaningful measurement of cutting-edge AI capabilities and limitations.
The complete Humanity's Last Exam benchmark is publicly available at https://lastexam.ai. Researchers and policymakers can use this resource to better understand current AI model capabilities and inform development decisions.