6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARD? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RUSSIAN WORK ON THE HAZARDS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION

Review

Leo P. Inglis

Share:
Cite This Study
Leo P. Inglis (n.d.). WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARD? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RUSSIAN WORK ON THE HAZARDS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION.
Show BibTeX
@article{why_the_double_standard_a_critical_review_of_russian_work_on_the_hazards_of_micr_g6128,
  author = {Leo P. Inglis},
  title = {WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARD? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RUSSIAN WORK ON THE HAZARDS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.