8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General1,187 citations

Yao K, Wang KJ, Sun ZH, Tan J, Xu W, Zhu LJ, Lu de Q

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2004

Share:

This particle physics study was misclassified and contains no EMF health research relevant to everyday exposure concerns.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study appears to be about particle physics detector systems at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, specifically analyzing trigger mechanisms that filter collision data. The research focuses on reducing data processing rates from 40 MHz to manageable levels for permanent storage. This is not an EMF health study but rather technical physics research about particle accelerator operations.

Why This Matters

This appears to be a misclassified study that has nothing to do with EMF health effects. The abstract describes particle physics research at CERN's CMS detector system, not biological EMF exposure studies. This highlights an important issue in EMF research databases where technical papers involving electromagnetic systems get confused with health studies. The reality is that particle accelerator research, while involving electromagnetic fields, operates in completely different contexts and power levels than the everyday EMF exposures we're concerned about from cell phones, WiFi, and power lines. What this means for you is the importance of distinguishing between legitimate EMF health research and unrelated technical studies that happen to mention electromagnetic phenomena.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 40 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 40 MHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2004). Yao K, Wang KJ, Sun ZH, Tan J, Xu W, Zhu LJ, Lu de Q.
Show BibTeX
@article{yao_k_wang_kj_sun_zh_tan_j_xu_w_zhu_lj_lu_de_q_ce3104,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Yao K, Wang KJ, Sun ZH, Tan J, Xu W, Zhu LJ, Lu de Q},
  year = {2004},
  doi = {10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020},
  
}
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020

Quick Questions About This Study

No, this study analyzes data processing systems at the Large Hadron Collider particle accelerator. It has nothing to do with biological EMF effects or health impacts from everyday electromagnetic field exposure.
This appears to be a database classification error. Technical papers involving electromagnetic systems at particle accelerators sometimes get mistakenly categorized with biological EMF health studies despite having completely different subject matter.
This study doesn't examine health effects. The 40 MHz mentioned refers to data processing rates in detector electronics, not biological EMF exposure. Particle accelerator facilities have strict safety protocols for actual radiation exposure.
No, particle accelerator electromagnetic systems operate at vastly different power levels and contexts than consumer devices. This technical research has no relevance to cell phone, WiFi, or power line EMF health concerns.
Nothing. This particle physics research provides no information about biological EMF effects. It demonstrates the importance of carefully distinguishing legitimate EMF health studies from unrelated technical papers mentioning electromagnetic phenomena.