3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Cell phone use and acoustic neuroma: the need for standardized questionnaires and access to industry data.

Bioeffects Seen

Han YY, Kano H, Davis DL, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. · 2009

View Original Abstract
Share:

Ten years of cell phone use more than doubles acoustic neuroma risk on the phone-use side of the head.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh reviewed 11 studies examining whether cell phone use increases the risk of acoustic neuroma, a type of brain tumor that develops near the ear. While most studies found no link, those that followed people for 10 years or longer showed cell phone users had 2.4 times higher risk of developing these tumors on the same side of their head where they held their phone. The researchers concluded that better study methods and access to actual phone usage data are needed to determine the true risk.

Why This Matters

This analysis highlights a critical pattern in EMF research: short-term studies often miss effects that only become apparent after prolonged exposure. The 2.4-fold increased risk for acoustic neuroma after 10 years of cell phone use is particularly concerning given that acoustic neuromas develop right where your phone's antenna transmits radiofrequency radiation into your head. What makes this research especially valuable is the researchers' honest assessment of study limitations and their call for better data collection methods, including access to actual phone billing records rather than relying on people's memories of their usage patterns.

The reality is that most people today have been using cell phones for well over a decade, yet we're still debating whether there's a cancer risk. The science demonstrates that we need longer follow-up periods and more precise exposure measurements to understand the full health implications of our wireless devices. You don't have to wait for perfect studies to take simple precautions like using speaker phone or headsets to keep your phone away from your head.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

This article critically evaluates current literature on cell phone use and AN risks and proposes additional studies to clarify any possible linkage.

Through a PubMed search, we identified and reviewed 10 case-control studies and 1 cohort study of AN...

Most studies did not find association between the development of AN and cell phone use, but some stu...

The evaluation of AN risk factors is challenging due to its long latency. Some studies of longer term cell phone use have found an increased risk of ipsilateral AN. Adopting a prospective approach to acquire data on cell phone use, obtaining retrospective billing records that provide independent evaluations of exposures, and incorporating information on other key potential risk factors from questionnaires could markedly advance the capacity of studies to evaluate the impact of cell phones on AN.

Cite This Study
Han YY, Kano H, Davis DL, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. (2009). Cell phone use and acoustic neuroma: the need for standardized questionnaires and access to industry data. Surg Neurol. 72(3):216-22; discussion 222, 2009.
Show BibTeX
@article{yy_2009_cell_phone_use_and_2147,
  author = {Han YY and Kano H and Davis DL and Niranjan A and Lunsford LD.},
  title = {Cell phone use and acoustic neuroma: the need for standardized questionnaires and access to industry data.},
  year = {2009},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19328527/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh reviewed 11 studies examining whether cell phone use increases the risk of acoustic neuroma, a type of brain tumor that develops near the ear. While most studies found no link, those that followed people for 10 years or longer showed cell phone users had 2.4 times higher risk of developing these tumors on the same side of their head where they held their phone. The researchers concluded that better study methods and access to actual phone usage data are needed to determine the true risk.