8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

Zhang X-J, Xiao Z-B, Gu J-X, Chen K, Wang J, Xu S-L, Xing K-K, Chen T

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2023

Share:

This particle physics study is not relevant to EMF health research and appears misclassified.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study appears to be particle physics research conducted at the BESIII detector, investigating subatomic particle collisions and resonances. The research involved measuring cross sections for specific particle interactions and discovering a new resonance at 4708 MeV. This is not EMF health research and has no relevance to electromagnetic field exposure effects on biological systems.

Why This Matters

This study has been misclassified in our EMF research database. The research involves high-energy particle physics experiments at the BEPCII storage ring, not electromagnetic field exposure studies relevant to human health. The 'EMF' referenced here relates to particle detector technology, not the radiofrequency or extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields that concern public health researchers. This highlights the importance of careful study classification when building EMF health databases, as particle physics research uses entirely different methodologies and addresses completely different questions than bioelectromagnetics research.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2023). Zhang X-J, Xiao Z-B, Gu J-X, Chen K, Wang J, Xu S-L, Xing K-K, Chen T.
Show BibTeX
@article{zhang_x_j_xiao_z_b_gu_j_x_chen_k_wang_j_xu_s_l_xing_k_k_chen_t_ce4281,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Zhang X-J, Xiao Z-B, Gu J-X, Chen K, Wang J, Xu S-L, Xing K-K, Chen T},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.211902},
  
}
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.211902PubMed: 38072611

Quick Questions About This Study

No, BESIII detector research involves high-energy particle physics experiments, not electromagnetic field health effects. This type of research studies subatomic particle interactions, not biological responses to EMF exposure.
The 4708 MeV resonance discovery has no relevance to EMF safety. This finding relates to particle physics and subatomic particle behavior, not electromagnetic field exposure effects on living organisms.
No, particle accelerator studies examine high-energy subatomic interactions, while cell phone radiation research focuses on biological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. These are completely different scientific domains with different methodologies.
No, cross section measurements in particle physics quantify probability of subatomic particle interactions. This has no application to studying how wireless technology electromagnetic fields affect biological systems or human health.
Particle physics studies may be misclassified due to shared terminology like 'electromagnetic fields' or 'radiation,' but these terms have different meanings in particle physics versus bioelectromagnetics research contexts.