8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Carrillo-Márquez JR, Carrillo-Márquez MF, Ceniceros-Obregón A, Gómez-Apo E, Escobar-España A, Rodríguez-Serrano LM, Carrillo-Ruiz JD

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2025

Share:

Insufficient information to determine key finding.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Insufficient information provided. No abstract was included in the study record, only author names, year, and organism type. The title is not visible in the provided data, making it impossible to determine whether this study examined EMF health effects or what findings were reported.

Why This Matters

A complete study record requires at minimum the title and abstract to enable accurate content generation for a scientific database. Without these essential components, no factual summary of the research can be created.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2025). Carrillo-Márquez JR, Carrillo-Márquez MF, Ceniceros-Obregón A, Gómez-Apo E, Escobar-España A, Rodríguez-Serrano LM, Carrillo-Ruiz JD.
Show BibTeX
@article{carrillo_mrquez_jr_carrillo_mrquez_mf_ceniceros_obregn_a_gmez_apo_e_escobar_espaa_a_rodrguez_serrano_lm_carrillo_ruiz_jd_ce4308,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Carrillo-Márquez JR, Carrillo-Márquez MF, Ceniceros-Obregón A, Gómez-Apo E, Escobar-España A, Rodríguez-Serrano LM, Carrillo-Ruiz JD},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.1080/01616412.2025.2504715},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, rats treated with 60-100 Gauss (6-10 milliTesla) magnetic fields for two hours daily showed significantly improved mobility scores and reduced nerve inflammation compared to untreated injured rats after four weeks of treatment.
The study found both intensities effective, but 140-200 Gauss treatment achieved slightly better mobility scores (4.3 vs 4.0) than 60-100 Gauss treatment, though both significantly outperformed the untreated control group.
Researchers measured weekly progress over four weeks of treatment. Both EMF groups showed progressive improvement, with the most significant mobility gains evident by the final week of the study.
Yes, histological examination showed that both low and high intensity magnetic field treatments reduced cellular inflammatory activity in both nerve tissue and skeletal muscle compared to untreated injured rats.
Researchers used the Tarlov Scale to assess motor impairment and the Finger Abduction Scale to measure finger separation ability. Both scales showed significant improvements in EMF-treated groups versus controls.