Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Cognitive and physiological responses in humans exposed to a TETRA base station signal in relation to perceived electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
Wallace D, Eltiti S, Ridgewell A, Garner K, Russo R, Sepulveda F, Walker S, Quinlan T, Dudley S, Maung S, Deeble R, Fox E · 2012
View Original AbstractTETRA emergency radio signals showed no immediate effects on thinking or physical responses, even in electromagnetically sensitive individuals.
Plain English Summary
Researchers tested whether exposure to TETRA radio signals (used by emergency services) affects thinking ability and physical responses in people who consider themselves sensitive to electromagnetic fields. After exposing 183 participants to real and fake TETRA signals in a controlled study, they found no differences in memory, attention, heart rate, or other measured responses. This adds to evidence that radio frequency exposure at these levels doesn't produce detectable immediate effects on cognitive function or basic physiological responses.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 420 MHz TETRA
Study Details
The present study is the first to examine whether acute exposure to a TETRA base station signal has an impact on cognitive functioning and physiological responses.
Participants were exposed to a 420 MHz TETRA signal at a power flux density of 10 mW/m2 as well as s...
We observed no differences in cognitive performance between sham and TETRA exposure in either group;...
These findings are similar to previous double‐blind studies with other mobile phone signals (900–2100 MHz), which could not establish any clear evidence that mobile phone signals affect health or cognitive function.
Show BibTeX
@article{d_2012_cognitive_and_physiological_responses_2818,
author = {Wallace D and Eltiti S and Ridgewell A and Garner K and Russo R and Sepulveda F and Walker S and Quinlan T and Dudley S and Maung S and Deeble R and Fox E},
title = {Cognitive and physiological responses in humans exposed to a TETRA base station signal in relation to perceived electromagnetic hypersensitivity.},
year = {2012},
doi = {10.1002/bem.20681},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bem.20681},
}Cited By (32 papers)
- Impact of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields on Cardiac Activity at Rest: A Systematic Review of Healthy Human StudiesInfluential
L. Michelant, B. Selmaoui (2025) - 2 citations
- EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses
I. Belyaev et al. (2016) - 212 citations
- Association between mobile phone use and inattention in 7102 Chinese adolescents: a population-based cross-sectional study
Feizhou Zheng et al. (2014) - 117 citations
- Effects of electromagnetic field exposure on the heart
O. Elmas (2016) - 40 citations
- IEI‐EMF provocation case studies: A novel approach to testing sensitive individuals
Adam Verrender et al. (2018) - 32 citations
- Effect of Low Level Subchronic Microwave Radiation on Rat Brain.
P. Deshmukh et al. (2016) - 32 citations
- Epidemiology of Electromagnetic Fields
M. Röösli (2014) - 31 citations
- The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on human self-reported symptoms: A systematic review of human experimental studies.
X. Bosch-Capblanch et al. (2024) - 26 citations
- Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS)
Dariusz Leszczyński (2021) - 24 citations
- The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on human self-reported symptoms: A protocol for a systematic review of human experimental studies
X. Bosch-Capblanch et al. (2021) - 24 citations