Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Do TETRA (Airwave) base station signals have a short-term impact on health and well-being? A randomized double-blind provocation study.2
Wallace D, Eltiti S, Ridgewell A, Garner K, Russo R, Sepulveda F, Walker S, Quinlan T, Dudley S, Maung S, Deeble R, Fox E. · 2012
View Original AbstractTETRA radio signals caused no detectable health effects in double-blind testing, suggesting electromagnetic sensitivity symptoms stem from awareness rather than exposure.
Plain English Summary
Researchers tested whether TETRA radio signals (used by UK police and emergency services) cause health symptoms in people who report being sensitive to electromagnetic fields. When participants didn't know whether they were exposed to real or fake signals, neither the sensitive individuals nor control subjects showed any physical or psychological effects from TETRA exposure. However, when people knew they might be exposed, those claiming sensitivity reported feeling worse, suggesting their symptoms stem from worry about EMF rather than the signals themselves.
Study Details
We conducted a randomized double-blind provocation study to establish whether short-term exposure to a TETRA base station signal has an impact on the health and well-being of individuals with self-reported "electrosensitivity" and of participants who served as controls.
Fifty-one individuals with self-reported electrosensitivity and 132 age- and sex-matched controls pa...
We found no differences on any measure between TETRA and sham (no signal) under double-blind conditi...
Our findings suggest that the adverse symptoms experienced by electrosensitive individuals are due to the belief of harm from TETRA base stations rather than to the low-level EMF exposure itself.
Show BibTeX
@article{d_2012_do_tetra_airwave_base_3483,
author = {Wallace D and Eltiti S and Ridgewell A and Garner K and Russo R and Sepulveda F and Walker S and Quinlan T and Dudley S and Maung S and Deeble R and Fox E.},
title = {Do TETRA (Airwave) base station signals have a short-term impact on health and well-being? A randomized double-blind provocation study.2},
year = {2012},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20075020/},
}Cited By (44 papers)
- Methodological limitations in experimental studies on symptom development in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) – a systematic reviewInfluential
Kristina Schmiedchen et al. (2019) - 42 citations
- Aggregated data from two double‐blind base station provocation studies comparing individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance with attribution to electromagnetic fields and controlsInfluential
Stacy Eltiti et al. (2015) - 30 citations
- Symptom Presentation in Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance With Attribution to Electromagnetic Fields: Evidence for a Nocebo Effect Based on Data Re-Analyzed From Two Previous Provocation StudiesInfluential
Stacy Eltiti et al. (2018) - 23 citations
- Health Effects of 5G Base Station Exposure: A Systematic ReviewInfluential
Tasneem Sofri et al. (2022) - 12 citations
- Cardiovascular Impacts of Air Pollution in a Coal-Burning Region: A Decade of Hospital Data from Western Macedonia, GreeceInfluential
Vasileios Vasilakopoulos et al. (2025)
- Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays
B. Levitt, H. Lai (2010) - 161 citations
- Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Sleep Quality: A Prospective Cohort Study
E. Mohler et al. (2012) - 60 citations
- Wireless communication fields and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a literature review
M. Röösli, K. Hug (2011) - 44 citations
- Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer.
A. Balmori (2022) - 43 citations