Use of portable exposure meters for comparing mobile phone base station radiation in different types of areas in the cities of Basel and Amsterdam.
Urbinello D, Huss A, Beekhuizen J, Vermeulen R, Röösli M. · 2014
View Original AbstractMeasurements of mobile phone base station radiation were highly repeatable across days and times, with area type and city explaining most variability.
Plain English Summary
Researchers used portable exposure meters to evaluate sources of data variability and repeatability of daily measurements. Exposure from mobile phone base stations ranged from 0.30 to 0.53 V/m in downtown and business areas and from 0.09 to 0.41 V/m in residential areas. Analysis of variance showed measurements were highly reproducible across days, with measurement day explaining 0.6% of variance, measurement time 0.2%, while area type explained 30% and city 50%.
Why This Matters
The authors concluded that mobile monitoring with portable exposure meters is useful because of high repeatability despite high spatial variation. Data were collected between November 2010 and January 2011 in four urban area types in Basel and Amsterdam.
Exposure Details
- Electric Field
- 0.09 to 0.41 V/m
Study Details
Our objective was to evaluate sources of data variability and the repeatability of daily measurements using portable exposure meters (PEMs).
Data were collected at 12 daysq between November 2010 and January 2011 with PEMs in four different t...
Exposure from mobile phone base stations ranged from 0.30 to 0.53 V/m in downtown and business areas...
We conclude that mobile monitoring of exposure from mobile phone base station radiation with PEMs is useful due to the high repeatability of mobile phone base station exposure levels, despite the high spatial variation.
Show BibTeX
@article{d_2014_use_of_portable_exposure_1389,
author = {Urbinello D and Huss A and Beekhuizen J and Vermeulen R and Röösli M.},
title = {Use of portable exposure meters for comparing mobile phone base station radiation in different types of areas in the cities of Basel and Amsterdam.},
year = {2014},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24091124/},
}Cited By (69 papers)
- Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, part 1. Rising ambient EMF levels in the environmentInfluential
B. Levitt et al. (2021) - 52 citations
- Genetic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fieldsInfluential
Henry C. Lai (2021) - 48 citations
- Characterisation of spatial and temporal variability of RF-EMF exposure levels in urban environments in Flanders, Belgium.Influential
Maarten Velghe et al. (2019) - 38 citations
- Analysis of the relationship between electromagnetic radiation characteristics and urban functions in highly populated urban areas.Influential
Chao Tang et al. (2019) - 24 citations
- Radiofrequency exposure levels in Amsterdam schoolsInfluential
Luuk van Wel et al. (2017) - 20 citations
- LetterToTheEditor RadiofrequencyExposureLevels in AmsterdamSchoolsInfluential
L. vanWel et al. (2017)
- Exposición a campos electromagnéticos de radiación no ionizante en la cohorte inma-granadaInfluential
I. C. Adamuz, I. C. Adamuz (2015)
- Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review
S. Sagar et al. (2018) - 100 citations
- Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Exposure Assessment in Indoor Environments: A Review
E. Chiaramello et al. (2019) - 99 citations
- Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities.
D. Urbinello et al. (2014) - 94 citations