6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields

Bioeffects Seen

Frei P, Mohler E, Neubauer G, Theis G, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J, Braun-Fahrländer C, Bolte J, Egger M, Röösli M. · 2009

View Original Abstract
Share:

Mean weekly personal exposure to all RF-EMF sources was 0.13 mW/m2, with mobile phone base stations, handsets, and DECT phones as the main contributors.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers measured RF-EMF exposure of 166 volunteers from Basel, Switzerland, using personal exposure meters carried for one week. Mean weekly exposure across all RF-EMF sources was 0.13 mW/m2, ranging across individuals from 0.014 to 0.881 mW/m2. Exposure varied considerably between persons and locations but was fairly consistent within persons.

Why This Matters

The study aimed to examine levels of exposure and the importance of different RF-EMF sources and settings in a sample of volunteers living in a Swiss city. Participants carried an exposimeter for one week and completed an activity diary; mean values were calculated using the robust regression on order statistics method. Mean values were highest in trains, airports, and tramways or buses, and higher during daytime than nighttime. Persons owning a DECT phone had a total mean exposure of 0.15 mW/m2, and those owning a mobile phone had 0.14 mW/m2, compared with 0.10 mW/m2 for those not owning a DECT or mobile phone. The Spearman correlation coefficient between mean exposure in the first and second week was 0.61, and exposure was described as fairly consistent within persons.

Exposure Details

Power Density
0.0000014, 0.000008, 0.0000881, 0.000013, 0.000015, 0.000016, 0.000014, 0.00001,0.000036, 0.000074, 0.000116 mW/cm²
Electric Field
0.22 V/m
Exposure Duration
1 week (two separate weeks in 32 participants)

Exposure Context

This study used 0.0000014, 0.000008, 0.0000881, 0.000013, 0.000015, 0.000016, 0.000014, 0.00001,0.000036, 0.000074, 0.000116 mW/cm² for radio frequency:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0.0000014, 0.000008, 0.0000881, 0.000013, 0.000015, 0.000016, 0.000014, 0.00001,0.000036, 0.000074, 0.000116 mW/cm²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Severe Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 714,286 times higher than this level

Study Details

To examine levels of exposure and the importance of different RF-EMF sources and settings in a sample of volunteers living in a Swiss city.

RF-EMF exposure of 166 volunteers from Basel, Switzerland, was measured with personal exposure meter...

Mean weekly exposure to all RF-EMF sources was 0.13 mW/m2 (0.22 V/m) (range of individual means 0.01...

Exposure to RF-EMF varied considerably between persons and locations but was fairly consistent within persons. Mobile phone handsets, mobile phone base stations and cordless phones were important sources of exposure in urban Switzerland.

Cite This Study
Frei P, Mohler E, Neubauer G, Theis G, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J, Braun-Fahrländer C, Bolte J, Egger M, Röösli M. (2009). Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields Environ Res. 109:779-785, 2009.
Show BibTeX
@article{p_2009_temporal_and_spatial_variability_980,
  author = {Frei P and Mohler E and Neubauer G and Theis G and Bürgi A and Fröhlich J and Braun-Fahrländer C and Bolte J and Egger M and Röösli M.},
  title = {Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields},
  year = {2009},
  
  url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935109000838},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Exposure was mainly due to mobile phone base stations at 32.0%, mobile phone handsets at 29.1%, and DECT phones at 22.7%.
Mean values were highest in trains, airports, and tramways or buses, and higher during daytime than nighttime.
The Spearman correlation coefficient between mean exposure in the first and second week was 0.61, and exposure was described as fairly consistent within persons.
Persons owning a DECT phone or mobile phone were exposed more than those not owning such devices.
Volunteers carried personal exposure meters for one week and completed an activity diary; mean values were calculated using the robust regression on order statistics method.