6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

The Effect of GSM Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Waking Electroencephalogram: Methodological Influences

Bioeffects Seen

Dalecki A, Verrender A, · 2021

Share:

Alpha power increase was greater for eyes open than eyes closed during both low and high RF-EMF exposures, and showed a trend to be larger later in the high exposure.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Thirty-six adults participated in three experimental sessions with sham, low (1 W/kg), and high (2 W/kg) RF-EMF exposures. Resting EEG was recorded at baseline, during, and after exposure. Alpha power increase was greater for eyes open than eyes closed during both low and high exposures. There was also a trend for the increase to be larger at the end of the high exposure compared to the start.

Why This Matters

The study aimed to test whether the effect of RF-EMF on EEG alpha power depends on eyes open or closed conditions and on earlier versus later exposure periods. The authors suggest that using eyes closed conditions and insufficient exposure durations may explain why some studies fail to detect an alpha power increase.

Cite This Study
Dalecki A, Verrender A, (2021). The Effect of GSM Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Waking Electroencephalogram: Methodological Influences.
Show BibTeX
@article{dalecki_a_verrender_a_ce3192,
  author = {Dalecki A and Verrender A and},
  title = {The Effect of GSM Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Waking Electroencephalogram: Methodological Influences},
  year = {2021},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Participants underwent three sessions: sham, low (1 W/kg), and high (2 W/kg) RF-EMF exposures.
Alpha power increase was greater for eyes open than eyes closed during both low and high RF-EMF exposures.
There was a trend for alpha power increase to be larger at the end of the high exposure compared to the start, in the eyes open condition.
The authors suggest that using eyes closed conditions and insufficient exposure durations may explain the failure to detect an increase, as these choices decrease signal-to-noise ratios and increase type II error.
Thirty-six adults participated in the study.