The response of human bacteria to static magnetic field and radiofrequency electromagnetic field.
Crabtree DPE, Herrera BJ, Kang S. · 2017
View Original AbstractLaboratory cultures of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus epidermidis showed variable growth under static magnetic field, and skin microbiota isolates from 4 subjects showed inconsistent growth responses.
Plain English Summary
The study aimed to investigate the response of human bacteria to static magnetic field and radiofrequency electromagnetic field. Researchers investigated the response of both laboratory culture strains and isolates of skin bacteria under static magnetic field (SMF) and RF-EMF. Growth patterns of laboratory cultures of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus epidermidis under SMF were variable per different species. Bacterial isolates of skin microbiota from 4 subjects with different cell phone usage history also showed inconsistent growth responses.
Why This Matters
These findings led the researchers to hypothesize that cell phone level RF-EMF disrupts human skin microbiota. The results lay ground for more comprehensive research on the effect of RF-EMF on human health through the human-microbiota relationship.
Study Details
The aim of this study is to investigate The response of human bacteria to static magnetic field and radiofrequency electromagnetic field.
we investigated the response of both laboratory culture strains and isolates of skin bacteria under ...
The growth patterns of laboratory cultures of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylo...
These findings led us to hypothesize that cell phone level RF-EMF disrupts human skin microbiota. Thus, the results from the current study lay ground for more comprehensive research on the effect of RF-EMF on human health through the human-microbiota relationship.
Show BibTeX
@article{dpe_2017_the_response_of_human_1998,
author = {Crabtree DPE and Herrera BJ and Kang S.},
title = {The response of human bacteria to static magnetic field and radiofrequency electromagnetic field.},
year = {2017},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28956351/},
}Cited By (15 papers)
- Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications?
A. Di Ciaula (2018) - 122 citations
- Interactions between electromagnetic radiation and biological systems
Lingyu Liu et al. (2024) - 57 citations
- Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 2 impacts: how species interact with natural and man-made EMF
B. Levitt et al. (2021) - 48 citations
- Natural and Synthetic Halogenated Amino Acids—Structural and Bioactive Features in Antimicrobial Peptides and Peptidomimetics
M. Mardirossian et al. (2021) - 24 citations
- Effects of Electromagnetic Waves with LTE and 5G Bandwidth on the Skin Pigmentation In Vitro
Kyuri Kim et al. (2020) - 23 citations
- Global gene expression analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 DH5α after exposure to 2.4 GHz wireless fidelity radiation
I. Said-Salman et al. (2019) - 22 citations
- Biological Effects of a Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field on Yeast Cells of the Genus Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
K. Sladicekova et al. (2021) - 8 citations
- MODULATION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS BIOFILM BY ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
Samuel Bucko et al. (2020) - 8 citations
- Antibacterial Susceptibility Pattern of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus after Exposure to Electromagnetic Waves Emitted from Mobile Phone Simulator
Mohammad Mehdi Movahedi et al. (2019) - 8 citations
- The Effect of Exposure to an Electromagnetic Field on Entomopathogenic Fungi
Dariusz Roman Ropek et al. (2024) - 2 citations