6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Symptoms & Sensitivity

Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone.

No Effects Found

Kim DW, Lee JH, Ji HC, Kim SC, Nam KC, Cha EJ. · 2008

View Original Abstract
Share:

CDMA phone radiation showed no immediate effects on heart rate or breathing in people claiming electromagnetic sensitivity during controlled 30-minute exposures.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed 18 people who claimed electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and 19 healthy controls to both real and fake cell phone radiation from a CDMA phone for 30 minutes each. They measured heart rate, breathing rate, and heart rate variability to see if the radiation caused physical changes. The study found no measurable differences in any of these body functions between real and fake exposure in either group.

Why This Matters

This study adds to a growing body of research examining electromagnetic hypersensitivity claims through controlled laboratory conditions. While the researchers found no measurable physiological changes during CDMA phone exposure, this doesn't invalidate the real symptoms many EHS individuals experience. The challenge with EHS research lies in the complexity of the condition and the difficulty of replicating real-world exposure scenarios in laboratory settings. What this study does demonstrate is that acute 30-minute CDMA exposures don't produce detectable changes in basic cardiovascular parameters. However, the broader question of EMF health effects extends far beyond EHS and encompasses cellular-level changes, long-term exposure patterns, and cumulative effects that may not manifest in short-term physiological measurements.

Study Details

The aim of this study is to investigate Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone.

In this study, two volunteer groups of 18 self-declared EHS and 19 controls were exposed to both sha...

In conclusion, the RF exposure by a CDMA cellular phone did not have any effects on the physiological parameters for both groups.

Cite This Study
Kim DW, Lee JH, Ji HC, Kim SC, Nam KC, Cha EJ. (2008). Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008:2322-2325, 2008.
Show BibTeX
@article{dw_2008_physiological_effects_of_rf_3137,
  author = {Kim DW and Lee JH and Ji HC and Kim SC and Nam KC and Cha EJ.},
  title = {Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone.},
  year = {2008},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19163166/},
}
PubMed: 19163166

Cited By (9 papers)

Quick Questions About This Study

A 2008 study found CDMA cell phone radiation had no effect on heart rate variability in either electromagnetically sensitive people or healthy controls. Researchers measured heart rate, breathing rate, and heart rate variability during 30-minute real and fake exposures, finding no measurable differences between exposure conditions.
Research shows people claiming electromagnetic hypersensitivity cannot reliably detect CDMA cell phone radiation. A controlled study exposed 18 self-identified sensitive individuals to both real and fake cell phone signals, finding no physiological differences that would indicate detection ability during 30-minute exposure sessions.
CDMA cell phone radiation does not affect breathing rate in people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, according to 2008 research. The study measured respiratory parameters in 18 self-identified sensitive people and 19 controls during real versus fake phone exposure, finding no significant changes in breathing patterns.
A 30-minute CDMA cell phone exposure produced no measurable physiological effects in electromagnetically sensitive people. Researchers monitored heart rate, breathing, and heart rate variability throughout the exposure period in both sensitive individuals and healthy controls, finding no time-dependent changes from the radiation.
Standard physiological tests including heart rate, respiratory rate, and heart rate variability measurements cannot detect CDMA cell phone radiation effects in electromagnetically hypersensitive people. A controlled study using these objective measures found no differences between real and fake 30-minute phone exposures in sensitive individuals.