3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Human exposure at two radio frequencies (450 and 2450 MHz): similarities and differences in physiological response.

Bioeffects Seen

Adair ER, Cobb BL, Mylacraine KS, Kelleher SA, · 1999

View Original Abstract
Share:

Human exposure to RF radiation above current safety limits triggers measurable physiological responses, including increased skin temperature and compensatory cooling mechanisms.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed 14 volunteers to radio frequency radiation at 450 and 2450 MHz (similar to cell phone frequencies) for 45 minutes at power levels exceeding current safety guidelines. The exposure caused measurable increases in skin temperature, with the body responding through increased sweating and blood flow to maintain normal core body temperature within 0.1 degrees Celsius.

Why This Matters

This study demonstrates that RF radiation at levels above current safety guidelines produces measurable physiological responses in humans, specifically thermal effects that trigger the body's cooling mechanisms. The research used SAR levels of 6.0 and 7.7 W/kg, which exceed the current FCC limit of 1.6 W/kg for cell phones by nearly four to five times. What makes this particularly relevant is that it shows biological responses occur even when the body successfully maintains thermal equilibrium. The researchers' conclusion that 'more practical dosimetry' is needed to evaluate real-world RF exposures highlights a critical gap in our current safety standards. While the study focuses on thermal effects, it provides clear evidence that RF radiation interacts with human physiology in measurable ways, supporting the need for more comprehensive research into both thermal and non-thermal biological effects of everyday wireless device use.

Exposure Details

SAR
6.0 and 7.7 W/kg
Source/Device
450 and 2450 MHz
Exposure Duration
45-min

Exposure Context

This study used 6.0 and 7.7 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 6.0 and 7.7 W/kgExtreme Concern0.1 W/kgFCC Limit1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 0x higher than this exposure level

Study Details

The aim of this study is to observe Human exposure at two radio frequencies (450 and 2450 MHz): similarities and differences in physiological response.

Thermoregulatory responses of heat production and heat loss were measured in two different groups of...

No change in metabolic heat production occurred under any exposure conditions at either frequency. T...

The observed frequency-related response differences agree with classical data concerning the control of heat loss mechanisms in human beings. However, more practical dosimetry than is currently available will be necessary to evaluate realistic human exposures to RF energy in the natural environment.

Cite This Study
Adair ER, Cobb BL, Mylacraine KS, Kelleher SA, (1999). Human exposure at two radio frequencies (450 and 2450 MHz): similarities and differences in physiological response. Bioelectromagnetics Suppl 4:12-20, 1999.
Show BibTeX
@article{er_1999_human_exposure_at_two_793,
  author = {Adair ER and Cobb BL and Mylacraine KS and Kelleher SA and},
  title = {Human exposure at two radio frequencies (450 and 2450 MHz): similarities and differences in physiological response.},
  year = {1999},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10334711/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Researchers exposed 14 volunteers to radio frequency radiation at 450 and 2450 MHz (similar to cell phone frequencies) for 45 minutes at power levels exceeding current safety guidelines. The exposure caused measurable increases in skin temperature, with the body responding through increased sweating and blood flow to maintain normal core body temperature within 0.1 degrees Celsius.