6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Radio Frequency

A discussion of potential exposure metrics for use in epidemiological studies on human exposure to radiowaves from mobile phone base stations.

No Effects Found

Schuz J, Mann S · 2000

View Original Abstract
Share:

The feasibility study found no valid metric for estimating historical exposures to radiowaves from mobile phone base stations, making population-level studies not feasible.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers conducted a feasibility study to test whether short-term electric field measurements, calculated field strengths, or distance from base stations could serve as exposure metrics for radiowaves. Measurements showed electric field strengths from base stations between 0.012 and 0.343 V/m, though broadcast radio and television transmitters often produced stronger signals. The study concluded that population-level studies on health effects are not feasible because no valid metric exists for estimating historical exposures.

Why This Matters

Current measurements are unlikely to represent past or future exposures due to the rapid pace of radio infrastructure development. Complex propagation characteristics such as shielding effects and multiple reflections from buildings affect base station antenna beams. These propagation factors combined with other environmental radiowave sources make distance from a base station a poor proxy for indoor exposure. Adapting network providers' computer models for epidemiological purposes may be possible but has not yet been investigated.

Exposure Details

Electric Field
0.012-0.343 V/m

Study Details

There is currently a high level of concern in many countries that exposure to radiowaves from mobile phone base stations may be hazardous to health. When investigating such suggested risks, epidemiologists need to define an exposure metric that can reliably discriminate between exposed and unexposed groups of people. We conducted a feasibility study to investigate if either short-term measurements of electric field strength, calculations of electric field strength, or distance from nearby mobile phone base stations could be used to develop a metric reflecting an individual's exposure to radiowaves.

With electric field strengths in the range of 0.012-0.343 V/m, radiowaves from mobile phone base sta...

Furthermore, there is little evidence that presently justifies epidemiological studies being restricted to adverse effects of radiowaves from mobile phone base stations while neglecting radiowaves at other frequencies produced by different transmitters.

Cite This Study
Schuz J, Mann S (2000). A discussion of potential exposure metrics for use in epidemiological studies on human exposure to radiowaves from mobile phone base stations. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 10(6 Pt 1):600-605, 2000.
Show BibTeX
@article{j_2000_a_discussion_of_potential_3380,
  author = {Schuz J and Mann S},
  title = {A discussion of potential exposure metrics for use in epidemiological studies on human exposure to radiowaves from mobile phone base stations.},
  year = {2000},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11140443/},
}
PubMed: 11140443

Cited By (53 papers)

View all 53 citing papers on Semantic Scholar

Quick Questions About This Study

The study investigated whether short-term electric field measurements, calculated field strengths, or distance from base stations could be used to develop a metric reflecting individual exposure to radiowaves.
Electric field strengths from mobile phone base stations ranged from 0.012 to 0.343 V/m, though stronger signals often came from broadcast radio and television transmitters.
No valid metric exists for estimating historical exposures to radiowaves from mobile phone base stations, making such studies infeasible.
Complex propagation characteristics like shielding and reflections from buildings, combined with other environmental radiowave sources, make distance a poor proxy for indoor exposure.
It may be possible to adapt network providers' computer models for epidemiological purposes, but this has not yet been investigated.