3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Exposure Types

Radio Frequency (RF)

Share:

Radio frequency electromagnetic fields are produced by wireless communication devices and broadcast signals. They range from about 3 kHz to 300 GHz and include frequencies used by cell phones, WiFi, Bluetooth, and 5G. RF is typically measured in microwatts per square meter (µW/m²) or milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm²).

Concern Level Thresholds

Based on Building Biology Institute guidelines (µW/m² (microwatts per square meter)):

No Concern
< 0.1 µW/m²
Slight Concern
0.1 – 10 µW/m²
Severe Concern
10 – 1,000 µW/m²
Extreme Concern
> 1,000 µW/m²

See where common exposures fall on the scale:

Your RF Exposure in ContextA logarithmic scale showing your reading relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and FCC regulatory limits.Your RF Exposure in ContextNo ConcernSlightSevereExtreme0.1101,000FCC Limit 0.01100,000 uW/m2

Showing 376 studies with measured radio frequency (rf) exposure

Pathological changes in the sinoatrial node tissues of rats caused by pulsed microwave exposure.

Liu YQ, Gao YB, Dong J, Yao BW, Zhao L, Peng RY. · 2015

Researchers exposed rats to pulsed microwave radiation and found significant damage to the sinoatrial node, the heart's natural pacemaker. At moderate to high power levels, the radiation caused cell swelling, structural damage, and permanent scarring that lasted up to 12 months, potentially affecting heart rhythm control.

[Effect of microwave radiation on primary cultured Sertoli cells.]

Gao XF et al. · 2009

Researchers exposed Sertoli cells (crucial cells that support sperm production in the testicles) to microwave radiation at different power levels for five minutes. They found that higher intensity radiation (100 mW/cm²) disrupted normal cell division, increased cell death, and caused calcium levels inside cells to spike. This suggests that microwave radiation can damage the cells essential for male fertility.

Resonance effect of millimeter waves in the power range from 10(-19) to 3 x 10(-3) W/cm2 on Escherichia coli cells at different concentrations.

Belyaev IY, Shcheglov VS, Alipov YD, Polunin VA · 1996

Russian researchers exposed E. coli bacteria to extremely weak millimeter waves (similar to 5G frequencies) and found that the bacteria's genetic material changed its physical structure in response. The effect occurred at specific frequencies and happened even at power levels trillions of times weaker than typical wireless device emissions. This suggests that biological systems can detect and respond to radiofrequency radiation at far lower intensities than previously thought possible.

Measurement and analysis of radiofrequency radiations from some mobile phone base stations in Ghana.

Amoako JK, Fletcher JJ, Darko EO. · 2009

Researchers measured radiofrequency radiation levels around 50 cell phone towers in Ghana to assess public exposure. They found radiation levels that were 20 times higher than typically measured in similar studies elsewhere, though still within international safety guidelines. The study highlights significant variation in exposure levels around cell towers and raises concerns about increasing radiation as mobile phone usage grows.

Trends in residential exposure to electromagnetic fields from 2006 to 2009.

Tomitsch J, Dechant E. · 2012

Researchers measured electromagnetic field exposure in bedrooms over a three-year period (2006-2009) to track how our daily EMF exposure is changing. They found that while electric and magnetic fields from power lines decreased slightly, radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices nearly doubled, increasing from 41.35 to 59.56 microwatts per square meter. This reflects the rapid expansion of cell towers, WiFi networks, and wireless technologies in residential areas during this period.

Measurements of Radiofrequency Radiation with a Body-Borne Exposimeter in Swedish Schools with Wi-Fi. Front.

Hedendahl LK, Carlberg M, Koppel T, Hardell L. · 2017

Swedish researchers had teachers wear radiation monitors in Wi-Fi equipped schools. They found radiofrequency exposure ranged from 1.1 to 66.1 µW/m² during normal activities, but spiked to 396.6 µW/m² when students streamed YouTube videos, showing how device usage dramatically increases classroom radiation levels.

Effects of Exposure to GSM mobile phone base station signals on salivary cortisol, alpha-amylase, and Immunoglobulin A.

Augner C et al. · 2010

Researchers exposed 57 people to cell tower signals at different power levels and measured stress hormones in their saliva. They found that exposure to radiofrequency radiation increased cortisol (a stress hormone) and alpha-amylase (a stress enzyme) at power levels far below current safety guidelines. This suggests that even low-level cell tower radiation may trigger biological stress responses in the human body.

GSM base stations: Short-term effects on well-being.

Augner C, Florian M, Pauser G, Oberfeld G, Hacker GW. · 2009

Austrian researchers exposed 57 people to different levels of radiofrequency radiation from cell phone base stations during controlled laboratory sessions. They found that participants felt significantly calmer when exposed to higher radiation levels compared to those exposed to minimal radiation. This suggests that cell tower signals may affect psychological well-being by reducing mental arousal.

Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields

Frei P et al. · 2009

Swiss researchers measured radiofrequency radiation exposure in 166 volunteers over one week using personal monitoring devices. They found that people are exposed to RF radiation throughout their daily lives, with the highest levels occurring on trains, in airports, and during daytime hours. The main sources of exposure were cell phone towers (32%), mobile phones (29%), and cordless phones (23%).

Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system.

Estenberg J, Augustsson T. · 2013

Swedish researchers developed a mobile monitoring system to measure radiofrequency radiation levels across different environments, collecting over 70,000 measurements in rural, urban, and city areas. They found that radiation levels increased dramatically from rural to urban settings, with city areas showing 150 times higher exposure than rural areas. The study demonstrates how cell phone towers create significant differences in public RF exposure depending on where you live and work.

Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations.

Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Kundi M. · 2006

Researchers measured EMF exposure from cell phone towers in the bedrooms of 365 people living nearby and tested their health and thinking abilities. Even though the radiation levels were extremely low (far below safety guidelines), people closer to the towers reported more headaches and showed changes in mental performance. This suggests that even very weak EMF exposure from cell towers might affect how people feel and think.

Extraordinary behavior disorders in cows in proximity to transmission stations.

Loscher W, Kas G, · 1998

German researchers studied dairy cows living near TV and cell phone transmission towers and found significant behavioral abnormalities over a two-year period. When they moved an affected cow 20 kilometers away from the antennas, its behavior completely normalized within five days, but the problems returned when the cow was brought back. The study suggests that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from the transmission equipment were the likely cause of these behavioral changes.

Modeled and Perceived Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields From Mobile-Phone Base Stations and the Development of Symptoms Over Time in a General Population Cohort.

Martens AL et al. · 2017

Dutch researchers tracked nearly 15,000 adults over three years to compare actual radiofrequency radiation exposure from cell towers (measured with precise modeling) versus people's perception of their exposure. They found that while actual exposure levels weren't linked to health symptoms, people who believed they were more exposed reported significantly more sleep problems and nonspecific symptoms like headaches and fatigue.

Classification of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) for epidemiological research: Evaluation of different exposure assessment methods.

Frei P et al. · 2010

Researchers measured 166 people's actual radiofrequency exposure for a week and compared it to common estimation methods used in health studies. People's own estimates of their wireless device usage showed almost no correlation with real exposure levels, while computer models performed much better for accurate health research.

Radio FrequencyNo Effects Found

Assessment of radiofrequency power density distribution around GSM and broadcast antenna masts in Lagos City

Ibitoye ZA, Aweda AM. · 2011

Nigerian researchers measured radiofrequency radiation levels around cell phone towers and broadcast antennas in Lagos City to assess public safety. They found power density levels ranging from 0.219 to 302.4 milliwatts per square meter, which were 20 to 50 times below international safety limits set by ICNIRP and IEEE. The study concluded that people staying at least 6 meters away from these antennas face minimal health risks from RF exposure.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Does exposure to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields cause cognitive and behavioral effects in 10-year-old boys?

Calvente I et al. · 2016

Spanish researchers measured radiofrequency radiation around the homes of 123 ten-year-old boys and tested their cognitive abilities and behavior. While most measures showed no effects, boys living in areas with higher RF exposure (though still below safety guidelines) had lower verbal skills and higher rates of anxiety-related behaviors compared to those in lower exposure areas. The researchers cautioned that study limitations prevent drawing definitive conclusions.