8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
SAR / Device Absorption

Comparison of radio frequency energy absorption in ear and eye region of children and adults at 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz.

Bioeffects Seen

Keshvari J, Lang S. · 2005

View Original Abstract
Share:

Children's RF absorption depends more on individual head shape than age, but this doesn't eliminate their unique vulnerability to wireless radiation.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers used computer models to compare how much radiofrequency energy is absorbed in children's heads versus adults' heads when exposed to cell phone frequencies. They found that differences in energy absorption depend more on individual head shape and anatomy rather than age itself. This challenges the common assumption that children automatically absorb more RF energy than adults.

Why This Matters

This Nokia-funded study represents an important early attempt to quantify RF absorption differences between children and adults, but its conclusions require careful interpretation. While the researchers found that head geometry matters more than age, this doesn't diminish concerns about children's RF exposure. The reality is that children's smaller heads, thinner skulls, and developing nervous systems create multiple pathways for increased vulnerability that extend beyond simple absorption rates. The science demonstrates that children face unique risks from RF exposure, and this single computational study shouldn't overshadow the growing body of research showing heightened sensitivity in developing brains.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 2.45 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 2.45 GHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study. The study examined exposure from: 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz

Study Details

The objective of this study was to clarify possible differences in RF energy absorption in the head region of children and adults using computational techniques.

Using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) computational method, a set of specific absorption ra...

The head models greatly differ from each other in terms of size, external shape and the internal ana...

It seems that the external shape of the head and the distribution of different tissues within the head play a significant role in the RF energy absorption.

Cite This Study
Keshvari J, Lang S. (2005). Comparison of radio frequency energy absorption in ear and eye region of children and adults at 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz. Phys Med Biol. 50(18):4355-4369, 2005.
Show BibTeX
@article{j_2005_comparison_of_radio_frequency_2274,
  author = {Keshvari J and Lang S.},
  title = {Comparison of radio frequency energy absorption in ear and eye region of children and adults at 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz.},
  year = {2005},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16148398/},
}
PubMed: 16148398

Cited By (66 papers)

View all 66 citing papers on Semantic Scholar

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, head anatomy significantly affects radiation absorption from 900 MHz phones. A 2005 study found that individual differences in head shape, size, and internal tissue distribution matter more than age when determining how much radiofrequency energy the brain absorbs from cell phones.
No, children don't always absorb more phone radiation at 1800 MHz frequencies. Research by Keshvari and Lang showed that radiation absorption differences depend more on individual head geometry and tissue distribution rather than age, challenging assumptions about children's vulnerability.
The 2005 study tested three key frequencies: 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, and 2450 MHz. These represent common cell phone and wireless device frequencies. Researchers used computer head models to compare radiation absorption patterns across different ages and anatomies.
Head shape significantly influences 2450 MHz radiation absorption by affecting how radiofrequency energy penetrates and distributes through tissues. The 2005 study found that external head geometry and internal tissue arrangement play major roles in determining absorption levels.
Computer models provide valuable insights for measuring ear radiation exposure, though they have limitations. The 2005 Keshvari study used head models to analyze absorption patterns, revealing that individual anatomical differences create significant variations in how ears absorb radiofrequency energy.