3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Nitric oxide modulates the responses of osteoclast formation to static magnetic fields

Bioeffects Seen

Zhang J, Ding C, Meng X, Shang P · 2018

View Original Abstract
Share:

Static magnetic fields alter bone cell formation through nitric oxide pathways, with effects occurring even at weak 500 nT levels.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed bone cells to three different strengths of static magnetic fields to study how they affect osteoclast formation (cells that break down bone tissue). They found that very strong magnetic fields (16 Tesla) reduced osteoclast formation through increased nitric oxide production, while weaker fields (500 nT and 0.2 T) had the opposite effect. This suggests magnetic fields can influence bone health by altering cellular signaling pathways.

Why This Matters

This research reveals that magnetic fields can directly influence bone cell behavior through nitric oxide pathways, adding another dimension to our understanding of EMF biological effects. While the study used extremely strong magnetic fields (16 Tesla is thousands of times stronger than typical MRI machines), the fact that even very weak fields (500 nT) produced measurable effects is noteworthy. The 500 nT exposure is actually within the range of some everyday magnetic field exposures from household appliances and power lines. What makes this study particularly significant is its demonstration that the body's nitric oxide system - crucial for cardiovascular health and cellular communication - responds differently depending on magnetic field strength. This suggests our bodies have evolved mechanisms to detect and respond to magnetic field variations, which challenges the assumption that non-ionizing EMF exposures are biologically inert.

Exposure Details

Magnetic Field
0.0005, 200, 16000 mG

Exposure Context

This study used 0.0005, 200, 16000 mG for magnetic fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0.0005, 200, 16000 mGExtreme Concern5 mGFCC Limit2,000 mGEffects observed in the No Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 4,000,000x higher than this exposure level

Study Details

To study whether Nitric oxide modulates the responses of osteoclast formation to static magnetic fields.

In this study, 500 nT of hypomagnetic field (HyMF), 0.2 T of moderate SMF (MMF) and 16 T of high SM...

Under 16 T, osteoclast formation was markedly decreased with enhanced NO synthase (NOS) activity, th...

Cite This Study
Zhang J, Ding C, Meng X, Shang P (2018). Nitric oxide modulates the responses of osteoclast formation to static magnetic fields Electromagn Biol Med. 37(1):23-34, 2018.
Show BibTeX
@article{j_2018_nitric_oxide_modulates_the_490,
  author = {Zhang J and Ding C and Meng X and Shang P},
  title = {Nitric oxide modulates the responses of osteoclast formation to static magnetic fields},
  year = {2018},
  doi = {10.1080/15368378.2017.1414057},
  url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15368378.2017.1414057},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Researchers exposed bone cells to three different strengths of static magnetic fields to study how they affect osteoclast formation (cells that break down bone tissue). They found that very strong magnetic fields (16 Tesla) reduced osteoclast formation through increased nitric oxide production, while weaker fields (500 nT and 0.2 T) had the opposite effect. This suggests magnetic fields can influence bone health by altering cellular signaling pathways.