Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Neoplastic Transformation in C3H 10T(1/2) Cells after Exposure to 835.62 MHz FDMA and 847.74 MHz CDMA Radiations.
Roti Roti JL , Malyapa RS, Bisht KS, Ahern EW, Moros EG, Pickard WF, Straube WL · 2001
View Original AbstractCell phone radiation at 0.6 W/kg SAR showed no cancer-causing effects in this laboratory study of mouse cells.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed mouse cells to cell phone radiation at frequencies used by FDMA and CDMA networks (835-848 MHz) for 7 days to see if it would cause normal cells to become cancerous. They also tested whether this radiation could promote cancer development in cells already damaged by X-rays. The study found no increased cancer transformation in cells exposed to either type of cell phone radiation compared to unexposed cells.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 835.62 MHz FDMA and 847.74 MHz CDMA Duration: 7 days and 42-days
Study Details
The effect of radiofrequency (RF) radiation in the cellular phone communication range (835.62 MHz frequency division multiple access, FDMA; 847.74 MHz code division multiple access, CDMA) on neoplastic transformation frequency was measured using the in vitro C3H 10T(1/2) cell transformation assay system.
To determine if 835.62 MHz FDMA or 847.74 MHz CDMA radiations have any genotoxic effects that induc...
After both the 7-day RF exposure and the 42-day RF exposure after X irradiation, no statistically s...
Show BibTeX
@article{jl_2001_neoplastic_transformation_in_c3h_3337,
author = {Roti Roti JL and Malyapa RS and Bisht KS and Ahern EW and Moros EG and Pickard WF and Straube WL},
title = {Neoplastic Transformation in C3H 10T(1/2) Cells after Exposure to 835.62 MHz FDMA and 847.74 MHz CDMA Radiations.},
year = {2001},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11121241/},
}Cited By (37 papers)
- Epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones and cancer risk: a reviewInfluential
J. Boice, J. Mclaughlin (2002) - 38 citations
- Mobile phone base station radiation does not affect neoplastic transformation in BALB/3T3 cellsInfluential
Hideki Hirose et al. (2008) - 24 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage.
J. L. Phillips et al. (2009) - 245 citations
- Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
H. W. Ruediger (2009) - 191 citations
- Mobile phones, mobile phone base stations and cancer: a review
J. Moulder et al. (2005) - 188 citations
- Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on seed germination and root meristematic cells of Allium cepa L.
M. Tkalec et al. (2009) - 142 citations
- Effects of 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field on DNA damage and expression of heat shock protein 70 in human lens epithelial cells.
Sun Lixia et al. (2006) - 127 citations
- Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation
M. Meltz (2003) - 121 citations
- Radio frequency electromagnetic fields: Cancer, mutagenesis, and genotoxicity
L. Heynick et al. (2003) - 80 citations