A revised economic analysis of restrictions on the use of cell phones while driving.

Bioeffects Seen

Cohen JT, Graham JD. · 2003

Economic analysis shows cell phone use while driving provides zero net benefit to society when crash risks are properly calculated.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers at Harvard analyzed the economic costs and benefits of allowing cell phone use while driving, finding that the convenience benefits are essentially canceled out by the increased crash risks and associated costs. Their revised analysis concluded there is zero net benefit to society from permitting phone use behind the wheel, contradicting earlier studies that suggested the practice should remain legal. This finding supports policy restrictions on driving while using mobile devices.

Why This Matters

While this study doesn't directly measure EMF health effects, it provides crucial context for understanding real-world cell phone exposure patterns and risks. The research demonstrates that even when accounting for the convenience benefits people derive from mobile phone use, the practice of driving while talking creates measurable harm to public safety. What this means for you: the widespread use of cell phones in potentially dangerous situations like driving reflects how normalized constant EMF exposure has become in our society. The study's finding of zero net benefit challenges the common assumption that any restriction on wireless device use automatically reduces quality of life, suggesting instead that strategic limitations on when and where we use these devices can serve the broader public interest without meaningful sacrifice.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

This article revises the assumptions used in the two previous analyses to make them consistent and updates them using recent data

The result is a best estimate of zero for the net benefit of cell phone use while driving, a finding...

Cite This Study

Cohen JT, Graham JD. (2003). A revised economic analysis of restrictions on the use of cell phones while driving. Risk Anal 23(1):5-17, 2003.

Show BibTeX

@article{jt_2003_a_revised_economic_analysis_1988,
  author = {Cohen JT and Graham JD.},
  title = {A revised economic analysis of restrictions on the use of cell phones while driving.},
  year = {2003},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12635719/},
}

PubMed: 12635719

Cited By (107 papers)

Cell Phones and Driving: Review of Research
A. McCartt et al. (2006) - 324 citations
Influential
Preface to the Special Section on Driver Distraction
John D. Lee, D. Strayer (2004) - 110 citations
Influential
Phoning while driving II: a review of driving conditions influence
C. Collet et al. (2010) - 83 citations
Influential
Did California’s hand-held cell phone ban reduce accidents?
Nicholas E. Burger et al. (2014) - 51 citations
Influential
Identifying peer states for transportation policy analysis with an application to New York's handheld cell phone ban
B. Sampaio (2014) - 29 citations
Influential
Risk Analysis: Celebrating the Accomplishments and Embracing Ongoing Challenges
M. Greenberg et al. (2020) - 17 citations
Influential
CELL PHONE USE WHILE DRIVING: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
J. Przybyla (2008) - 2 citations
Influential
Driver distraction: Breakdowns of a multi-level control process
M. Stevenson et al. (2008)
Influential
Beginning Preface to the Special Section on Driver Distraction
D. Boehm-Davis et al. (2006)
Influential
Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm
Rui P. S. Fartaria et al. (2005) - 2,940 citations

View all 107 citing papers on Semantic Scholar

Quick Questions About This Study

Harvard researchers found zero net economic benefit from allowing cell phone use while driving. The convenience benefits are completely canceled out by increased crash risks and associated costs, contradicting earlier studies that suggested the practice should remain legal.

The 2003 Harvard analysis found that crash risks and associated costs from cell phone use while driving exactly equal any convenience benefits. This creates zero net benefit to society, supporting policy restrictions on mobile device use behind the wheel.

Harvard's revised cost-effectiveness analysis found that allowing cell phone use while driving increases the cost per quality adjusted life year compared to previous estimates. However, both the original and revised estimates contain significant uncertainty according to the researchers.

Harvard researchers revised their economic analysis because their updated findings differed substantially from previous studies. The revision moved estimates in the opposite direction, finding zero net benefit rather than supporting continued legal use of phones while driving.

The Harvard economic analysis supports policy restrictions on cell phone use while driving. Since convenience benefits are canceled out by crash costs, creating zero net societal benefit, the research provides economic justification for driving bans on mobile devices.