6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Mobile phone use, behavioural problems and concentration capacity in adolescents: A prospective study

No Effects Found

Roser K, Schoeni A, Röösli M · 2016

View Original Abstract
Share:

Longitudinal analyses found no consistent evidence that the use of wireless communication devices or RF-EMF exposure affects behavioral problems or concentration capacity in adolescents.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

The HERMES study sample consisted of 439 Swiss adolescents aged 12–17 years. Researchers assessed behavioral problems with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and concentration capacity with a standardized computerized cognitive test named FAKT. Cross-sectional analyses showed behavioral problems associated with self-reported wireless device use but not operator-recorded mobile phone use, while concentration capacity was associated with both self-reported and operator-recorded exposures. Longitudinal analyses found no consistent associations between RF-EMF exposure measures and either outcome. The authors suggest information bias and reverse causality likely explain the cross-sectional findings.

Why This Matters

The study aimed to prospectively investigate whether RF-EMF emitted by mobile phones and other wireless communication devices is related to behavioral problems or concentration capacity in adolescents. Exposure measures included self-reported and operator-recorded wireless communication device use, cumulative RF-EMF brain and whole body dose, and measured personal RF-EMF exposure.

Study Details

The aim of this study is to prospectively investigate whether exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) emitted by mobile phones and other wireless communication devices is related to behavioural problems or concentration capacity in adolescents.

The HERMES (Health Effects Related to Mobile phonE use in adolescentS) study sample consisted of 439...

In the cross-sectional analyses behavioural problems were associated with several self-reported wire...

The lack of consistent exposure-response patterns in the longitudinal analyses suggests that behavioural problems and concentration capacity are not affected by the use of wireless communication devices or RF-EMF exposure. Information bias and reverse causality are likely explanations for the observed cross-sectional findings.

Cite This Study
Roser K, Schoeni A, Röösli M (2016). Mobile phone use, behavioural problems and concentration capacity in adolescents: A prospective study . Int J Hyg Environ Health.; 219(8):759-769, 2016.
Show BibTeX
@article{k_2016_mobile_phone_use_behavioural_2801,
  author = {Roser K and Schoeni A and Röösli M},
  title = {Mobile phone use, behavioural problems and concentration capacity in adolescents: A prospective study},
  year = {2016},
  
  url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1438463916300645},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The HERMES study included 439 Swiss adolescents aged 12–17 years and used cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses over one year.
Behavioral problems were assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and concentration capacity was measured with a standardized computerized cognitive test named FAKT.
Cross-sectional analyses showed behavioral problems associated with several self-reported wireless device use measures but not operator-recorded mobile phone use, while concentration capacity was associated with both self-reported and operator-recorded exposures.
Longitudinal analyses pointed towards an absence of associations, with no consistent exposure-response patterns suggesting that behavioral problems and concentration capacity are not affected by wireless device use or RF-EMF exposure.
The authors considered information bias and reverse causality as likely explanations for the observed cross-sectional findings.