8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Case-control study on risk factors for testicular cancer.

Bioeffects Seen

Hardell L, Nasman A, Ohlson CG, Fredrikson M. · 1998

View Original Abstract
Share:

Men with extended computer screen exposure showed 80% higher testicular cancer risk in this Swedish study.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Swedish researchers studied 148 men with testicular cancer and 314 healthy controls to identify occupational risk factors. They found that men working with video display units (computer screens) had an 80% higher risk of testicular cancer after extended exposure (about 480 working days). Amateur radio operators, radar workers, and electronics engineers also showed elevated risks, though based on smaller numbers of cases.

Why This Matters

This 1998 Swedish study provides early evidence linking electromagnetic field exposures to testicular cancer, particularly from video display units. What makes this research significant is that it examined multiple EMF sources in the same population, finding consistent patterns of elevated cancer risk. The 80% increased risk for extended VDU work is particularly concerning given how ubiquitous computer screens have become in modern workplaces. The researchers also found elevated risks among amateur radio operators and electronics workers, suggesting a broader pattern of EMF-related cancer risk. While the authors appropriately note that some findings need further study due to small sample sizes, the consistency of elevated risks across different EMF sources strengthens the overall pattern. This study adds to the growing body of evidence that occupational EMF exposures may contribute to cancer development, particularly in reproductive organs.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

The aim of this study is to investigate Case-control study on risk factors for testicular cancer.

Occupational exposures were assessed in a case-control study on testicular cancer using self adminis...

Answers were obtained for 148 (91%) cases and 314 (87%) controls. Of the cases 101 had seminoma and ...

Because of low numbers of exposed subjects in some calculations some of these results might be spurious and need to be further studied.

Cite This Study
Hardell L, Nasman A, Ohlson CG, Fredrikson M. (1998). Case-control study on risk factors for testicular cancer. Int J Oncol 13(6):1299-1303, 1998.
Show BibTeX
@article{l_1998_casecontrol_study_on_risk_2159,
  author = {Hardell L and Nasman A and Ohlson CG and Fredrikson M.},
  title = {Case-control study on risk factors for testicular cancer.},
  year = {1998},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9824648/},
}

Cited By (51 papers)

Quick Questions About This Study

A Swedish study found men who worked with computer screens had an 80% higher risk of testicular cancer after extended exposure (about 480 working days). However, researchers noted the increased risk was modest and needs further study to confirm the connection.
Swedish researchers found radar workers had twice the risk of testicular cancer compared to other men. However, this finding was based on very few cases, so the researchers cautioned the result might be coincidental and requires additional studies.
A 1998 study found amateur radio operators had 2.2 times higher risk of testicular cancer than controls. However, this was based on few exposed subjects, so researchers emphasized the need for larger studies to confirm this potential link.
Swedish research found electronics and telecommunications engineers had 2.3 times higher testicular cancer risk. However, the study included few workers in these fields, so researchers noted the finding might be spurious and needs verification through larger studies.
A Swedish study found elevated testicular cancer risks among men exposed to electromagnetic fields through computer work, radar equipment, and amateur radio operation. However, researchers emphasized these preliminary findings need confirmation through larger, more comprehensive studies.