8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Brain & Nervous System

Limited associations were found between vicinity to cell towers and some general symptoms; however, no association was found with school RFR levels

Bioeffects Seen

Durusoy et al · 2017

Share:

Wildlife studies reveal ambient EMF causes biological effects across all species at today's background exposure levels.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This comprehensive review examined how ambient electromagnetic fields affect wildlife across all species and frequencies. Researchers found biological effects on orientation, migration, reproduction, and survival at extremely low intensities comparable to today's background EMF levels. The study calls for recognizing EMF as environmental pollution requiring wildlife protection standards.

Why This Matters

This review represents a critical shift in how we understand EMF impacts beyond human health. The science demonstrates that wildlife species experience biological disruption at ambient EMF levels we now consider normal background exposure. What this means for you is that the same EMF environment affecting wildlife migration and reproduction surrounds us daily from cell towers, WiFi networks, and wireless devices. The reality is that if ambient EMF can disrupt fundamental biological processes across all animal kingdoms at vanishingly low intensities, we cannot assume these same exposures are benign for human biology. The evidence shows we need environmental EMF standards that protect both wildlife and human health, not just prevent immediate thermal effects.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Durusoy et al (2017). Limited associations were found between vicinity to cell towers and some general symptoms; however, no association was found with school RFR levels.
Show BibTeX
@article{limited_associations_were_found_between_vicinity_to_cell_towers_and_some_general_symptoms_however_no_association_was_found_with_school_rfr_levels_ce4791,
  author = {Durusoy et al},
  title = {Limited associations were found between vicinity to cell towers and some general symptoms; however, no association was found with school RFR levels},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.1515/reveh-2021-0026},
  
}
DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0026PubMed: 34047144

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, this review found biological effects across all taxa and frequencies. Wildlife impacts include disrupted orientation, migration patterns, food finding abilities, reproduction, mating behaviors, nest building, territorial defense, and reduced longevity at ambient EMF levels.
Research shows biological effects occur at vanishingly low EMF intensities comparable to current ambient exposures. These background levels, which have risen exponentially in recent decades, can disrupt fundamental biological processes in wildlife species.
The study argues EMF should be recognized as a novel form of pollution requiring regulation. Current standards don't exist for long-term chronic low-level exposures, and environmental laws should treat air as habitat requiring EMF protection.
EMF levels have risen sharply over 80 years, creating novel energetic exposure that previously didn't exist. Recent decades show exponential increases in nearly all environments, including remote rural areas and atmospheric regions.
Yes, due to unique physiologies, some flora and fauna species are sensitive to EMF in ways that may surpass human reactivity. This suggests wildlife can serve as early indicators of biological EMF effects.