3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

IN SITU EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT OF INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCY FIELDS OF DIVERSE DEVICES.

Bioeffects Seen

Van Den Bossche M, Verloock L, Aerts S, Joseph W, Martens L. · 2014

View Original Abstract
Share:

Common devices like touchscreens and energy-saving bulbs exceed international safety limits for electric fields at typical usage distances.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Belgian researchers tested electromagnetic fields from touchscreens, energy-saving bulbs, and fluorescent lamps. They found these common devices exceed international safety limits when used within arm's reach, with touchscreens surpassing limits by 56% at close range. Users should maintain 15-25 centimeters distance for safety.

Why This Matters

This research exposes a troubling gap between the devices we use daily and the safety standards designed to protect us. The science demonstrates that touchscreens, energy-saving bulbs, and fluorescent lamps routinely exceed ICNIRP reference levels for electric field exposure - not at extreme distances, but at the ranges where we actually interact with these technologies. What this means for you is that the 'safe' distances aren't being communicated to consumers, and manufacturers aren't required to design products that comply with exposure limits at normal usage distances. The reality is that intermediate frequency fields occupy a regulatory blind spot, receiving less attention than either power line frequencies or cell phone radiation, despite our increasing exposure through modern electronics and lighting.

Exposure Details

Electric Field
155.7 V/m
Source/Device
44 kHz

Exposure Context

This study used 155.7 V/m for electric fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Study Details

In this study, in situ exposure assessment of both electric and magnetic fields of different intermediate frequency (IF) sources is investigated.

The authors investigated smart boards and touchscreens, energy-saving bulbs, fluorescent lamps, a po...

or most of these sources, the electric field is the dominating quantity. International Commission on...

Cite This Study
Van Den Bossche M, Verloock L, Aerts S, Joseph W, Martens L. (2014). IN SITU EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT OF INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCY FIELDS OF DIVERSE DEVICES. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014 Aug 14. pii: ncu257.
Show BibTeX
@article{m_2014_in_situ_exposure_assessment_1398,
  author = {Van Den Bossche M and Verloock L and Aerts S and Joseph W and Martens L.},
  title = {IN SITU EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT OF INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCY FIELDS OF DIVERSE DEVICES.},
  year = {2014},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25125596/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Belgian researchers tested electromagnetic fields from touchscreens, energy-saving bulbs, and fluorescent lamps. They found these common devices exceed international safety limits when used within arm's reach, with touchscreens surpassing limits by 56% at close range. Users should maintain 15-25 centimeters distance for safety.