3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Measured radiofrequency exposure during various mobile-phone use scenarios.

Bioeffects Seen

Kelsh MA, Shum M, Sheppard AR, McNeely M, Kuster N, Lau E, Weidling R, Fordyce T, Kühn S, Sulser C. · 2010

View Original Abstract
Share:

Your phone's RF emissions vary dramatically based on technology and location, with rural users facing significantly higher exposure levels.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers measured the actual radiofrequency (RF) power output from mobile phones during real-world use across urban, suburban, and rural areas. They found that phone technology was the biggest factor determining RF exposure levels, with older analog phones producing the highest emissions and CDMA phones the lowest. Rural areas generally showed higher power output than urban areas, likely because phones work harder to reach distant cell towers.

Why This Matters

This study addresses a critical gap in our understanding of real-world mobile phone exposure. While most research relies on theoretical models or self-reported usage data, these researchers actually measured what phones emit during daily use. The finding that rural users face higher RF exposure is particularly significant because it contradicts the common assumption that all phone users receive similar doses. What this means for you: your actual EMF exposure depends heavily on where you live and what type of phone you use. The reality is that exposure assessment in EMF research has been notoriously imprecise, which may explain inconsistencies in health studies. This research provides the kind of quantitative exposure data that's essential for understanding the true relationship between mobile phone use and health effects.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

We report quantitative measurements of mobile-phone power output as a function of phone technology, environmental terrain, and handset design

Radiofrequency (RF) output data were collected using software-modified phones that recorded power co...

Technology was the strongest predictor of RF power output. The older analog technology produced the ...

Our findings suggest that phone technology, and to a lesser extent, degree of urbanization, are the two stronger influences on RF power output. Software-modified phones should be useful for improving epidemiologic exposure assessment.

Cite This Study
Kelsh MA, Shum M, Sheppard AR, McNeely M, Kuster N, Lau E, Weidling R, Fordyce T, Kühn S, Sulser C. (2010). Measured radiofrequency exposure during various mobile-phone use scenarios. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol.21(4):343-54, 2010.
Show BibTeX
@article{ma_2010_measured_radiofrequency_exposure_during_2266,
  author = {Kelsh MA and Shum M and Sheppard AR and McNeely M and Kuster N and Lau E and Weidling R and Fordyce T and Kühn S and Sulser C.},
  title = {Measured radiofrequency exposure during various mobile-phone use scenarios.},
  year = {2010},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20551994/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Researchers measured the actual radiofrequency (RF) power output from mobile phones during real-world use across urban, suburban, and rural areas. They found that phone technology was the biggest factor determining RF exposure levels, with older analog phones producing the highest emissions and CDMA phones the lowest. Rural areas generally showed higher power output than urban areas, likely because phones work harder to reach distant cell towers.