6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Oxidative effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure in cells and cell-free media.

Bioeffects Seen

Pakhomova ON, Khorokhorina VA, Bowman AM, Rodaitė-Riševičienė R, Saulis G, Xiao S, Pakhomov AG · 2012

View Original Abstract
Share:

Nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure generated both extracellular and intracellular reactive oxygen species, including hydrogen peroxide, in cells and cell-free media.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers assessed reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in cultured cells and media exposed to 300-ns pulsed electric fields at 1 to 13 kV/cm. In cell-free media, the pulsed electric field facilitated conversion of H2DCF into the fluorescent marker DCF, an effect reduced by catalase but not by mannitol or superoxide dismutase, and not related to heating. The researchers concluded that bioeffects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields are not limited to electropermeabilization, and that concurrent ROS formation may lead to cell stimulation and/or oxidative cell damage.

Why This Matters

In cell suspensions, the fluorescent signal increased in proportion to the number of pulses and the density of cells present. DCF emission continued to rise over time after exposure in nsPEF-sensitive Jurkat cells, but remained stable in nsPEF-resistant U937 cells, suggesting that cell type influenced the oxidative response. Formation of hydrogen peroxide in treated media was separately confirmed by increased oxidation of Amplex Red, and ROS increase within individual cells was visualized by oxidation of DHE. The researchers framed oxidative effects as a possible separate primary mechanism responsible for bioeffects, distinct from the better-known effect of electropermeabilization.

Exposure Details

Electric Field
100000 -1300000 V/m
Source/Device
300-ns PEF

Exposure Context

This study used 100000 -1300000 V/m for electric fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Study Details

We hypothesized that oxidative effects of nsPEF could be a separate primary mechanism responsible for bioeffects.

ROS production in cultured cells and media exposed to 300-ns PEF (1–13 kV/cm) was assessed by oxidat...

When a suspension of H2DCF-loaded cells was subjected to nsPEF, the yield of fluorescent 2′,7′-dichl...

Cite This Study
Pakhomova ON, Khorokhorina VA, Bowman AM, Rodaitė-Riševičienė R, Saulis G, Xiao S, Pakhomov AG (2012). Oxidative effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure in cells and cell-free media. Arch Biochem Biophys. 527(1):55-64, 2012.
Show BibTeX
@article{on_2012_oxidative_effects_of_nanosecond_436,
  author = {Pakhomova ON and Khorokhorina VA and Bowman AM and Rodaitė-Riševičienė R and Saulis G and Xiao S and Pakhomov AG},
  title = {Oxidative effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure in cells and cell-free media.},
  year = {2012},
  
  url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003986112003037},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The study examined 300-nanosecond pulsed electric fields at intensities of 1 to 13 kV/cm applied to cultured cells and cell-free media.
The effect in cell-free media was not related to heating, and was reduced by catalase but not by mannitol or superoxide dismutase.
Formation of hydrogen peroxide in pulsed-electric-field-treated media was confirmed by increased oxidation of Amplex Red.
DCF emission increased over time after exposure in nsPEF-sensitive Jurkat cells, but remained stable in nsPEF-resistant U937 cells.
The researchers concluded that concurrent ROS formation may lead to cell stimulation and/or oxidative cell damage.