8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Cancer & Tumors

Effects of GSM-900 microwaves on DMBA-induced mammary gland tumors in female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Bioeffects Seen

Anane R, Dulou P-E, Taxile M, Geffard M, Crespeau F, Veyret B. · 2003

View Original Abstract
Share:

Cell phone radiation showed inconsistent effects on breast tumor promotion in rats, with no clear dose-response pattern.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation for 2 hours daily while monitoring breast tumor development. Results showed inconsistent effects across different radiation levels, with no clear pattern of increased cancer risk, leading scientists to conclude the evidence was too weak to establish harm.

Why This Matters

This study represents an important attempt to examine whether cell phone radiation acts as a cancer promoter - meaning it doesn't cause cancer directly but accelerates existing tumor growth. The exposure levels tested (0.1 to 3.5 W/kg SAR) span from well below to above typical cell phone exposures, which range from about 0.5 to 2.0 W/kg during calls. What makes these results particularly noteworthy is their inconsistency - the researchers found some tumor promotion at moderate exposure levels but not at higher ones, which defies the typical dose-response relationship you'd expect if radiation were truly promoting cancer growth. While negative studies like this are often dismissed, the reality is that inconsistent results across different exposure levels suggest the relationship between EMF and cancer promotion may be more complex than simple linear effects. The science demonstrates we still lack definitive answers about EMF's role in cancer development, underscoring why precautionary approaches to cell phone use remain prudent.

Exposure Details

SAR
0.1 , 0.7, 1.4, 2.2 and 3.5 W/kg
Source/Device
GSM-900
Exposure Duration
2 h/day, 5 days/week for 9 weeks

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0.1 , 0.7, 1.4, 2.2 and 3.5 W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the Extreme Concern rangeFCC limit is 16x higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 900 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 900 MHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

The aim of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that sub-chronic whole-body exposure to GSM-900 microwaves had an effect on tumor promotion and progression.

Mammary tumors were induced by ingestion of a single 10-mg dose of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (D...

The results are negative in terms of latency, multiplicity and tumor volume. With regard to tumor in...

Overall, these results, which are rather inconsistent, do not bring new evidence of a co-promoting effect of exposure to GSM-900 signals using the DMBA rat model.

Cite This Study
Anane R, Dulou P-E, Taxile M, Geffard M, Crespeau F, Veyret B. (2003). Effects of GSM-900 microwaves on DMBA-induced mammary gland tumors in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Radiat Res 160:492–497, 2003.
Show BibTeX
@article{r_2003_effects_of_gsm900_microwaves_820,
  author = {Anane R and Dulou P-E and Taxile M and Geffard M and Crespeau F and Veyret B.},
  title = {Effects of GSM-900 microwaves on DMBA-induced mammary gland tumors in female Sprague-Dawley rats.},
  year = {2003},
  
  url = {https://meridian.allenpress.com/radiation-research/article-abstract/160/4/492/41833/Effects-of-GSM-900-Microwaves-on-DMBA-Induced},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

A 2003 study exposing rats to GSM cell phone radiation for 2 hours daily found no consistent pattern linking the exposure to breast tumor development. Results varied unpredictably across different radiation levels, providing no clear evidence that cell phone signals promote breast cancer growth.
Research on GSM-900 cell phone signals showed inconsistent cancer effects in laboratory rats. While one radiation level showed slightly increased tumor rates, higher and lower levels showed no effect, leading scientists to conclude the evidence was too weak to establish increased cancer risk.
A controlled study found that daily cell phone radiation exposure produced inconsistent effects on tumor development in rats. The research showed no clear pattern of tumor promotion, with results varying unpredictably across different radiation strength levels, suggesting no definitive harmful impact.
Laboratory research examining breast cancer development found no consistent evidence that cell phone radiation increases tumor risk. Daily 2-hour exposures produced mixed results across different signal strengths, with scientists concluding the findings were too inconsistent to demonstrate cancer-promoting effects.
Studies on breast tissue exposure to cell phone radiation show inconsistent results. Research monitoring tumor development in laboratory animals found no clear pattern of tissue damage or cancer promotion, with effects varying unpredictably across different radiation levels and exposure conditions.