Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals. I. Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells.
Tice RR, Hook GG, Donner M, McRee DI, Guy AW. · 2002
View Original AbstractExposure to RF signals for 24 hours at SARs of 5.0 or 10.0 W/kg significantly increased micronucleated lymphocytes about fourfold, while 3-hour exposures and DNA damage were not significantly increased.
Plain English Summary
DNA damage in leukocytes was assessed with the alkaline comet assay and chromosomal damage in lymphocytes with the micronucleus assay. No significant increase in DNA damage was seen after 3 or 24 hours, and no increase in micronucleated lymphocytes occurred after 3 hours. However, 24-hour exposures at 5.0 or 10.0 W/kg significantly increased micronucleated lymphocytes about fourfold, regardless of signal type, modulation, or frequency.
Why This Matters
The study was designed as an in vitro evaluation of DNA and chromosomal damage in human blood leukocytes and lymphocytes. The authors concluded that under extended exposure conditions RF signals at an average SAR of at least 5.0 W/kg can induce chromosomal damage in human lymphocytes.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 01-Oct W/kg
- Source/Device
- 837 MHz, voice modulated 1909.8 MHz
- Exposure Duration
- 3 or 24 Hours
Exposure Context
This study used 01-Oct W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 2.5x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
In vitro studies evaluated the induction of DNA and chromosomal damage in human blood leukocytes and lymphocytes, respectively.
The signals were voice modulated 837 MHz produced by an analog signal generator or by a time divisio...
Exposure for either 3 or 24 h did not induce a significant increase in DNA damage in leukocytes, nor...
This research demonstrates that, under extended exposure conditions, RF signals at an average SAR of at least 5.0 W/kg are capable of inducing chromosomal damage in human lymphocytes.
Show BibTeX
@article{rr_2002_genotoxicity_of_radiofrequency_signals_1363,
author = {Tice RR and Hook GG and Donner M and McRee DI and Guy AW.},
title = {Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals. I. Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells.},
year = {2002},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11835258/},
}Cited By (244 papers)
- Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline.Influential
R. Aitken et al. (2005) - 315 citations
- Controversial Cytogenetic Observations in Mammalian Somatic Cells Exposed to Radiofrequency RadiationInfluential
G. Obe (2004) - 143 citations
- Genetic effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR).Influential
L. Verschaeve (2005) - 87 citations
- No Evidence for Genotoxic Effects from 24 h Exposure of Human Leukocytes to 1.9 GHz Radiofrequency FieldsInfluential
J. McNamee et al. (2003) - 69 citations
- Bone morphogenetic protein expression in newborn rat kidneys after prenatal exposure to radiofrequency radiationInfluential
A. Pyrpasopoulou et al. (2004) - 42 citations
- Epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones and cancer risk: a reviewInfluential
J. Boice, J. Mclaughlin (2002) - 38 citations
- Gene Expression does not Change Significantly in C3H 10T½ Cells after Exposure to 847.74 CDMA or 835.62 FDMA Radiofrequency RadiationInfluential
Timothy Whitehead et al. (2006) - 36 citations
- Genotoxic Potential of 1.6 GHz Wireless Communication Signal: In Vivo Two-Year BioassayInfluential
L. Sasser et al. (2003) - 36 citations
- Micronucleus frequency in erythrocytes of mice after long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiationInfluential
J. Juutilainen et al. (2007) - 35 citations
- The influence of differently polarised microwave radiation on chromatin in human cellsInfluential
Y. Shckorbatov et al. (2009) - 28 citations