Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Whole body exposure of rats to microwaves emitted from a cell phone does not affect the testes.
Dasdag S, Zulkuf Akdag M, Aksen F, Yilmaz F, Bashan M, Mutlu Dasdag M, Salih Celik M. · 2003
View Original AbstractThe study found no evidence of adverse effects on testicular function or structure from cell phone exposure.
Plain English Summary
Sixteen Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into exposed and sham-exposed groups of eight each. The exposed group received cell phone radiation for 20 minutes per day, seven days a week, for one month. No statistically significant alterations were found in any endpoints, including sperm count, morphology, testicular histology, lipid composition, malondialdehyde concentration, p53 immune reactivity, or rectal temperature.
Why This Matters
Rats were housed in plexiglas cages with phones positioned 0.5 cm below the cage floor. Sham-exposed rats experienced the same setup but with phones turned off. Whole-body average SAR was 0.52 W/kg and peak 1-g SAR was 3.13 W/kg for a radiated power of 250 mW.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 0.52, 3.13 W/kg
- Exposure Duration
- 20 min per day (7 days a week) for 1 month
Exposure Context
This study used 0.52, 3.13 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 1.3x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of radiofrequency radiation emitted from cellular phones on the lipid composition, malondialdehyde concentration, p53 immune reactivity, sperm count, morphology, histological structure of testes, and on rectal temperature of rats exposed to microwave radiation emitted from cellular phones.
Sixteen Spraque-Dawley rats were separated into two groups of eight, sham exposed (control) and expe...
No statistically significant alteration in any of the endpoints was noted.
This study found no evidence suggesting an adverse effect of cell phone exposure on measures of testicular function or structure.
Show BibTeX
@article{s_2003_whole_body_exposure_of_2993,
author = {Dasdag S and Zulkuf Akdag M and Aksen F and Yilmaz F and Bashan M and Mutlu Dasdag M and Salih Celik M.},
title = {Whole body exposure of rats to microwaves emitted from a cell phone does not affect the testes.},
year = {2003},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12669301/},
}Cited By (197 papers)
- Cell phones and male infertility: a review of recent innovations in technology and consequences.Influential
A. Agarwal et al. (2011) - 219 citations
- Electromagnetic fields (900 MHz) evoke consistent molecular responses in tomato plantsInfluential
David Roux et al. (2006) - 84 citations
- Cell phones: modern man's nemesis?Influential
K. Makker et al. (2009) - 78 citations
- Association between mobile phone use and semen quality: a systemic review and meta‐analysisInfluential
Kun Liu et al. (2014) - 69 citations
- Oxidative stress induced by 1.8 GHz radio frequency electromagnetic radiation and effects of garlic extract in ratsInfluential
B. Avcı et al. (2012) - 68 citations
- Recent Advances in Research on Radiofrequency Fields and Health: 2001–2003Influential
D. Krewski et al. (2007) - 58 citations
- Long-term effects of 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from mobile phone on testicular tissue and epididymal semen qualityInfluential
M. Taş et al. (2014) - 48 citations
- Mobile phone radiation during pubertal development has no effect on testicular histology in ratsInfluential
L. Tumkaya et al. (2016) - 33 citations
- Quantitative changes in testicular structure and function in rat exposed to mobile phone radiationInfluential
M. Çetkin et al. (2017) - 25 citations
- Effects of low level electromagnetic field exposure at 2.45 GHz on rat corneaInfluential
A. Akar et al. (2013) - 13 citations