6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Effects of 2G and 3G mobile phones on performance and electrophysiology in adolescents, young adults and older adults

Bioeffects Seen

Leung S, Croft RJ, McKenzie RJ, Iskra S, Silber B, Cooper NR, O'Neill B, Cropley V, Diaz-Trujillo A, Hamblin D, Simpson D. · 2011

View Original Abstract
Share:

Exposure to 2G and 3G mobile phone signals was associated with changes in brain activity and, for adolescents, reduced accuracy on a memory task.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study examined sensory and cognitive processing in adolescents, young adults and older adults when exposed to 2G and 3G mobile phone signals. Forty-one 13–15 year olds, forty-two 19–40 year olds and twenty 55–70 year olds were tested using a double-blind cross-over design, where each participant received Sham, 2G and 3G exposures, separated by at least 4 days. On a memory task, adolescents performed less accurately during 3G exposure compared to Sham, and delayed brainwave responses were found in both 2G and 3G conditions across all age groups.

Why This Matters

The researchers used two tasks: an auditory 3-stimulus oddball task and an N-back task, which were tailored to each individual's ability level. In the 3-stimulus oddball task, accuracy and reaction time of responses to targets were not affected by exposure. However, an augmented N1 brainwave response was found in the 2G condition, and this was independent of age group. On the N-back task, the combined groups performed less accurately during 3G exposure compared to Sham, with post hoc tests finding this effect separately in adolescents only. The researchers concluded that this study provides support for an effect of acute 2G and 3G exposure on human cognitive function.

Exposure Details

SAR
0.7 and 1.7 W/kg
Source/Device
894.6 MHz and 1,900 MHz
Exposure Duration
continuous for 55 min

Exposure Context

This study used 0.7 and 1.7 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0.7 and 1.7 W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 2 times higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 894.6 MHz - 1.90 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 894.6 MHz - 1.90 GHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

This study examined sensory and cognitive processing in adolescents, young adults and older adults, when exposed to 2nd (2G) and 3rd (3G) generation mobile phone signals.

Tests employed were the auditory 3-stimulus oddball and the N-back. Forty-one 13–15 year olds, forty...

3-Stimulus oddball task: Behavioural: accuracy and reaction time of responses to targets were not af...

Employing tasks tailored to each individual’s ability level, this study provides support for an effect of acute 2G and 3G exposure on human cognitive function.

Cite This Study
Leung S, Croft RJ, McKenzie RJ, Iskra S, Silber B, Cooper NR, O'Neill B, Cropley V, Diaz-Trujillo A, Hamblin D, Simpson D. (2011). Effects of 2G and 3G mobile phones on performance and electrophysiology in adolescents, young adults and older adults Clin Neurophysiol. 122(11):2203-2216, 2011.
Show BibTeX
@article{s_2011_effects_of_2g_and_123,
  author = {Leung S and Croft RJ and McKenzie RJ and Iskra S and Silber B and Cooper NR and O'Neill B and Cropley V and Diaz-Trujillo A and Hamblin D and Simpson D. },
  title = {Effects of 2G and 3G mobile phones on performance and electrophysiology in adolescents, young adults and older adults},
  year = {2011},
  
  url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138824571100263X},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Forty-one 13–15 year olds, forty-two 19–40 year olds and twenty 55–70 year olds participated.
Each participant received Sham, 2G and 3G exposures in a double-blind cross-over design, separated by at least 4 days.
Accuracy and reaction time of responses to targets were not affected by exposure in the 3-stimulus oddball task.
Post hoc tests found the reduction in N-back accuracy during 3G exposure separately in adolescents only.
Delayed ERD/ERS responses of the alpha power were found in both 3G and 2G conditions compared to Sham, independent of age group.