Individual differences in the effects of mobile phone exposure on human sleep: Rethinking the problem
Loughran SP, McKenzie RJ, Jackson ML, Howard ME, Croft RJ. · 2012
View Original AbstractEEG spectral power in the sleep spindle frequency range increased after mobile phone-like exposure, with the effect varying by individual.
Plain English Summary
Twenty volunteers each underwent two experimental nights in which they were randomly exposed to either an active or sham condition before a full night of sleep. EEG spectral power was increased in the sleep spindle frequency range in the first 30 minutes of non-REM sleep after active exposure. The increase was more prominent in participants who had already shown an increase in the original study, suggesting the effect is sensitive to individual variability.
Why This Matters
The researchers hypothesised that individual differences in response might partly explain why studies in this area have produced inconsistent results. The study confirmed previous findings of mobile phone-like emissions affecting the EEG during non-REM sleep. The authors suggested that previous negative results are not strong evidence for a lack of an effect, given that individual variability may obscure findings. They concluded that the interpretation of results and the manner in which research is conducted in this field may need to be reconsidered.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 0.11 and 0.674 W/kg
- Source/Device
- 894.6 MHz
- Exposure Duration
- continuous for 30 min
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
We hypothesised that these differences might partly be due to individual variability in response, and that mobile phone emissions may in fact have large but differential effects on human brain activity.
Twenty volunteers from our previous study underwent an adaptation night followed by two experimental...
The EEG spectral power was increased in the sleep spindle frequency range in the first 30 min of no...
Show BibTeX
@article{sp_2012_individual_differences_in_the_130,
author = {Loughran SP and McKenzie RJ and Jackson ML and Howard ME and Croft RJ.},
title = {Individual differences in the effects of mobile phone exposure on human sleep: Rethinking the problem},
year = {2012},
doi = {10.1002/bem.20691},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bem.20691},
}Cited By (69 papers)
- Sleep EEG alterations: effects of pulsed magnetic fields versus pulse‐modulated radio frequency electromagnetic fieldsInfluential
M. Schmid et al. (2012) - 56 citations
- Effects of electromagnetic fields emitted from W‐CDMA‐like mobile phones on sleep in humansInfluential
S. Nakatani-Enomoto et al. (2013) - 33 citations
- Inter‐individual and intra‐individual variation of the effects of pulsed RF EMF exposure on the human sleep EEGInfluential
C. Lustenberger et al. (2015) - 32 citations
- Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).
Unknown authors (2020) - 1,297 citations
- EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses
I. Belyaev et al. (2016) - 212 citations
- ICNIRP GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ( 100 K H Z TO 300 GH Z )
Unknown authors (2020) - 77 citations
- A Prospective Cohort Study of Adolescents’ Memory Performance and Individual Brain Dose of Microwave Radiation from Wireless Communication
Milena Foerster et al. (2018) - 57 citations
- Effects of mobile phone exposure (GSM 900 and WCDMA/UMTS) on polysomnography based sleep quality: An intra- and inter-individual perspective.
H. Danker-Hopfe et al. (2016) - 53 citations
- Radiofrequency signal affects alpha band in resting electroencephalogram.
R. Ghosn et al. (2015) - 51 citations
- Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses
M. Dieudonné (2020) - 49 citations