Exposure to ELF- magnetic field promotes restoration of sensori-motor functions in adult rats with hemisection of thoracic spinal cord
Das S, Kumar S, Jain S, Avelev VD, Mathur R. · 2012
View Original AbstractExposing spinal-cord-injured rats to a 50 Hz, 17.96 μT magnetic field for 2 hours a day over 6 weeks was associated with faster recovery of movement and bladder control compared with sham-exposed rats.
Plain English Summary
Researchers studied the effect of a 50 Hz, 17.96 μT magnetic field on rats after a hemisection injury of the T13 spinal cord, measuring locomotor function, motor responses to noxious stimuli, and neuronal excitability. Rats were divided into a sham-exposed group and a group exposed to the magnetic field for 2 hours per day for 6 weeks. The magnetic-field-exposed group showed a statistically significant improvement in BBB score over the sham control group, and bladder control was dramatically restored earlier than in the sham group. The researchers suggested that this magnetic field exposure promotes recovery of sensori-motor behavior including locomotion and bladder control in spinal-cord-injured rats.
Why This Matters
The study compared two groups of rats, both with a T13 spinal cord hemisection injury: one group received sham exposure and the other received magnetic field exposure for 2 hours per day over 6 weeks. Locomotor recovery was tracked using the BBB score, which showed statistically significant improvement in the magnetic-field group over the sham control group. Tail flick latency and threshold of tail flick also improved earlier in the magnetic-field group. Threshold of simple vocalization gradually restored in the magnetic-field group. The survival rate was 100% in the magnetic-field-exposed group, compared with 90% in the sham-exposed group. The threshold of H-reflex was reduced on the ipsilateral side compared with the contralateral side in both the sham and magnetic-field groups.
Exposure Details
- Magnetic Field
- 0.01796 mT
- Source/Device
- 50 Hz
- Exposure Duration
- 2 h/d x 6wks
Exposure Context
This study used 0.01796 mT for magnetic fields:
- 898x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.2 mG
- 179.6x above the BioInitiative Report recommendation of 1 mG
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
In the present study, the effect of (50 Hz), low-intensity (17.96 μT) magnetic field (MF) exposure of rats after-hemisection of T13 spinal cord (hSCI) was investigated on sensori-motor and locomotor functions.
Rats were divided into hSCI (sham-exposed) and hSCI+MF (MF: 2 h/d X 6 weeks) groups. Besides their g...
It is found that, in the hSCI+MF group, a statistically significant improvement over the hSCI contr...
The results of our study suggest that extremely low-frequency (50 Hz), low-intensity (17.96 μT) MF exposure for 2 h/d x 6wks promotes recovery of sensori-motor behavior including locomotion and bladder control both in terms of temporal pattern and magnitude in hemisection injury of (T13) spinal cord rats.
Show BibTeX
@article{s_2012_exposure_to_elf_magnetic_239,
author = {Das S and Kumar S and Jain S and Avelev VD and Mathur R.},
title = {Exposure to ELF- magnetic field promotes restoration of sensori-motor functions in adult rats with hemisection of thoracic spinal cord},
year = {2012},
doi = {10.3109/15368378.2012.695706},
url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2012.695706},
}Cited By (32 papers)
- Emerging medical applications based on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields from 0 Hz to 10 THzInfluential
M. Mattsson, M. Simkó (2019) - 48 citations
- The regenerative effects of electromagnetic field on spinal cord injuryInfluential
Christina L. Ross et al. (2016) - 37 citations
- Extremely low frequency magnetic field protects injured spinal cord from the microglia- and iron-induced tissue damageInfluential
S. Dey et al. (2017) - 20 citations
- Neurological effects of static and extremely-low frequency electromagnetic fieldsInfluential
H. Lai (2022) - 9 citations
- Effect of Low Intensity Magnetic Field Stimulation on Calcium-Mediated Cytotoxicity After Mild Spinal Cord Contusion Injury in RatsInfluential
Supti Bhattacharyya et al. (2020) - 8 citations
- Advances in electrical and magnetic stimulation on nerve regeneration.
Yun Qian et al. (2019) - 63 citations
- Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) on catalase, cytochrome P450 and nitric oxide synthase in erythro-leukemic cells.
A. Patruno et al. (2015) - 57 citations
- Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Affect Transcript Levels of Neuronal Differentiation-Related Genes in Embryonic Neural Stem Cells
Qinlong Ma et al. (2014) - 54 citations
- Advanced therapies in wound management: cell and tissue based therapies, physical and bio-physical therapies smart and IT based technologies.
A. Piaggesi et al. (2018) - 49 citations