Possible risks due to exposure of workers and patients with implants by TETRA transmitters.
Cecil S, Neubauer G, Rauscha F, Stix G, Müller W, Breithuber C, Glanzer M. · 2014
View Original AbstractTETRA radio transmitters don't interfere with medical implants when kept 30 centimeters away, confirming current safety protocols work.
Plain English Summary
Researchers tested whether TETRA radio transmitters (used by police and emergency services) could interfere with medical implants like pacemakers when first responders work closely with patients. They found that keeping the transmitters at least 30 centimeters (about 12 inches) away from implants prevents any interference, and all exposure levels stayed well below safety limits.
Why This Matters
This research addresses a practical concern that emerges as wireless communication becomes ubiquitous in emergency services. The science demonstrates that TETRA transmitters pose minimal risk to implant function when basic distance precautions are followed. What makes this study particularly relevant is its real-world focus on occupational scenarios where first responders regularly interact with patients who may have cardiac pacemakers or other electronic implants. The 30-centimeter safety distance identified here aligns with previous research on mobile phones and implants, suggesting consistent interference patterns across different wireless technologies. For emergency service workers and patients alike, this research provides reassurance that current safety protocols are adequate, while reinforcing the importance of maintaining appropriate distances during patient care.
Exposure Information
Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.
Study Details
The main focus of our study was to investigate the functionality of several types of implants when exposed to TETRA transmitters. Moreover, we investigated the difference in the degree of exposure of users of TETRA transmitters when they carry the devices in different locations near the body, and when they use them in different positions near the head.
Our results show that a compliance distance of 30 cm between implant and transmitter is sufficient t...
Show BibTeX
@article{s_2014_possible_risks_due_to_1958,
author = {Cecil S and Neubauer G and Rauscha F and Stix G and Müller W and Breithuber C and Glanzer M.},
title = {Possible risks due to exposure of workers and patients with implants by TETRA transmitters.},
year = {2014},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24436224/},
}