8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2009

Share:

Swedish study found no clear link between mobile phone use and blood-brain barrier damage markers.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Swedish researchers tested whether mobile and cordless phone use affects blood-brain barrier integrity by measuring S100B protein levels in 1,000 adults. The study found no significant association between wireless phone use and elevated S100B levels, suggesting these devices don't appear to compromise the blood-brain barrier based on this biomarker.

Why This Matters

This study addresses a critical question in EMF research: whether wireless phones can compromise the blood-brain barrier, our brain's protective shield against toxins. While the results appear reassuring, the 31% response rate raises questions about participant selection bias, and the researchers themselves acknowledge that larger studies are needed. The finding of a weak association with UMTS (3G) use in men, though based on small numbers, deserves attention given that 3G operates at higher power levels than older technologies. What's particularly relevant is that this study examined real-world exposure patterns rather than controlled laboratory conditions, making it more applicable to how we actually use these devices daily.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2009). Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L.
Show BibTeX
@article{sderqvist_f_carlberg_m_hardell_l_ce3492,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L},
  year = {2009},
  doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.051},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

S100B is a protein that increases in blood when the blood-brain barrier is damaged. The blood-brain barrier protects your brain from toxins and harmful substances in your bloodstream, so elevated S100B levels could indicate this protective barrier is compromised.
The study found a weak negative association with cordless phone use, meaning users actually had slightly lower S100B levels. However, this finding wasn't statistically significant and the researchers noted it needs further investigation in larger studies.
Of 1,000 randomly selected Swedish adults contacted, only 314 participated by completing questionnaires and providing blood samples. Low response rates can introduce bias if participants differ systematically from non-participants in their phone use or health status.
Male UMTS (3G network) users showed a statistically significant association with S100B levels based on how recently they started using this technology. However, this finding involved only 31 men and requires confirmation in larger studies.
The study failed to find evidence of blood-brain barrier damage, but the researchers emphasized that larger studies with longer follow-up periods are needed. One biomarker study cannot definitively prove safety or harm for all potential health effects.