8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Brain & Nervous System

Car phones and car crashes: an ecologic analysis.

No Effects Found

Min ST, Redelmeier DA · 1998

View Original Abstract
Share:

This population-level study couldn't detect cellular phone effects on driving safety, but such broad analyses have inherent limitations in identifying real risks.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers analyzed car accident data from Toronto between 1984-1993 to see if cellular phone use correlated with increased crashes. They found that areas with the biggest increases in collision rates actually had the smallest increases in phone usage. The study concluded that cellular phones' effects on driving safety are too small to detect using this type of population-level analysis.

Study Details

Some countries have regulations against using a cellular telephone while driving. We used ecologic analysis to evaluate cellular telephone use and motor vehicle collisions in a city without such regulations.

We studied locations in Toronto, Ontario (n=75) that were hazardous (total colli- sions=3,234) and t...

Locations with the largest increases in collision rates tended to have the smallest increases in est...

The effects of cellular telephones on driving ability are small relative to the biases in ecologic analysis. Claims from industry, which argue that cellular telephones are not dangerous based on ecologic analysis, can be misleading in the policy debate about whether to regulate cellular telephone use while driving.

Cite This Study
Min ST, Redelmeier DA (1998). Car phones and car crashes: an ecologic analysis. Can J Public Health 89(3):157-161, 1998.
Show BibTeX
@article{st_1998_car_phones_and_car_3247,
  author = {Min ST and Redelmeier DA},
  title = {Car phones and car crashes: an ecologic analysis.},
  year = {1998},
  
  url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990274/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

A 1998 study analyzing Toronto crash data from 1984-1993 found no evidence that car phones increased accident rates. Areas with the biggest increases in collision rates actually had the smallest increases in phone usage, suggesting no detectable safety impact at the population level.
According to Min and Redelmeier's 1998 analysis, cellular phones' effects on driving safety are too small to detect using population-level crash data. The study found that ecologic analysis cannot reliably measure the impact of phone use on driving ability.
The 1998 Toronto study concluded that industry claims arguing cellular phones aren't dangerous based on ecologic analysis can be misleading. The researchers found that population-level data has too many biases to accurately assess driving safety effects.
Toronto crash data from 1984-1993 showed an unexpected pattern: locations with the largest increases in collision rates had the smallest increases in cellular phone usage. This finding contradicted expectations about phone-related driving risks at the population level.
The 1998 Toronto analysis demonstrated that ecologic studies have inherent biases that prevent accurate measurement of cellular phone effects on driving. The researchers concluded that such population-level analyses shouldn't be used to guide policy decisions about phone regulation.