Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Effects of high peak power microwaves on the retina of the rhesus monkey.
Lu ST, Mathur SP, Stuck B, Zwick H, D'Andrea JA, Ziriax JM, Merritt JH, Lutty G, McLeod DS, Johnson M, · 2000
View Original AbstractCone photoreceptor response to light flash was enhanced at 8.4 and 20.2 W/kg R-SAR but not at 4.3 W/kg, and no degenerative changes or ERG depression were observed.
Plain English Summary
Researchers studied retinal effects of 1.25 GHz high peak power microwaves in Rhesus monkeys. Preexposure and postexposure fundus pictures and angiograms were all within normal limits. Cone photoreceptor response to light flash was enhanced at 8.4 and 20.2 W/kg R-SAR but not at 4.3 W/kg R-SAR. Enhanced glycogen storage in photoreceptors was observed in sham, 8.4, and 20.2 W/kg groups but not in the 4.3 W/kg group. No degenerative changes or ERG depression were observed, and retinal injury was considered very unlikely at 4 W/kg.
Why This Matters
Microwaves were delivered anteriorly to the face with pulse characteristics of 1.04 MW peak power, 5.59 micros pulse length, and repetition rates up to 2.79 Hz. Exposure occurred 4 hours per day, 3 days per week for 3 weeks, totaling nine exposures. The supranormal cone photoreceptor b-wave was R-SAR dependent and may be an early indicator of mild injury.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 0, 4.3, 8.4, or 20.2 W/kg
- Source/Device
- 1.25 GHz
- Exposure Duration
- 3 days per week for 3 weeks
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
We studied the retinal effects of 1.25 GHz high peak power microwaves in Rhesus monkeys.
Preexposure fundus photographs, retinal angiograms, and electroretinograms (ERG) were obtained to sc...
The preexposure and postexposure fundus pictures and angiograms were all within normal limits. The r...
We concluded that retinal injury is very unlikely at 4 W/kg. Functional changes that occur at higher R-SAR are probably reversible since we saw no evidence of histopathologic correlation with ERG changes
Show BibTeX
@article{st_2000_effects_of_high_peak_3211,
author = {Lu ST and Mathur SP and Stuck B and Zwick H and D'Andrea JA and Ziriax JM and Merritt JH and Lutty G and McLeod DS and Johnson M and},
title = {Effects of high peak power microwaves on the retina of the rhesus monkey.},
year = {2000},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10972948/},
}Cited By (30 papers)
- RECENT ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ON RADIOFREQUENCY FIELDS AND HEALTHInfluential
Daniel Krewski et al. (2001) - 86 citations
- Effects of low level electromagnetic field exposure at 2.45 GHz on rat corneaInfluential
A. Akar et al. (2013) - 13 citations
- No influence of acute RF exposure (GSM‐900, GSM‐1800, and UMTS) on mouse retinal ganglion cell responses under constant temperature conditionsInfluential
Malte T. Ahlers, J. Ammermüller (2014) - 11 citations
- Radiofrequency Biology: In vivoInfluential
Masamichi Kato (2006) - 3 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Ocular effects of radiofrequency energy
J. Elder (2003) - 109 citations
- 2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human cells
Sanggyu Lee et al. (2005) - 98 citations
- Electroporation of mammalian cells by nanosecond electric field oscillations and its inhibition by the electric field reversal
Elena C. Gianulis et al. (2015) - 66 citations
- Changes in human EEG caused by low level modulated microwave stimulation
H. Hinrikus et al. (2004) - 50 citations
- MILLIMETER WAVE ABSORPTION IN THE NONHUMAN PRIMATE EYE AT 35 GHz AND 94 GHz
S. Chalfin et al. (2002) - 49 citations