Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans.
Lerchl A, Klose M, Grote K, Wilhelm AF, Spathmann O, Fiedler T, Streckert J, Hansen V, Clemens M. · 2015
View Original AbstractExposed animals had significantly more lung and liver tumors and lymphomas than controls, but no clear dose-response effect was found.
Plain English Summary
Exposed animals had significantly more lung and liver tumors than sham-exposed controls. Lymphomas were also significantly elevated in exposed animals. No clear dose-response effect was observed.
Why This Matters
The study aimed to investigate tumor promotion by radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below human exposure limits. The researchers confirmed and extended earlier findings from a pilot study with carcinogen-treated mice. They hypothesized that metabolic changes due to exposure may cause the tumor-promoting effects. Many tumor-promoting effects occurred at low to moderate exposure levels well below mobile phone user limits. The findings may help explain increased brain tumor incidences in heavy mobile phone users. Most previous in vitro and in vivo studies did not find cancerogenic effects of RF-EMF.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 0, 0.04, 0.4 and 2 W/kg
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The aim of this study is to investigate Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans.
We have performed a replication study using higher numbers of animals per group and including two ad...
We could confirm and extend the originally reported findings. Numbers of tumors of the lungs and liv...
Our findings may help to understand the repeatedly reported increased incidences of brain tumors in heavy users of mobile phones.
Show BibTeX
@article{a_2015_tumor_promotion_by_exposure_1147,
author = {Lerchl A and Klose M and Grote K and Wilhelm AF and Spathmann O and Fiedler T and Streckert J and Hansen V and Clemens M.},
title = {Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans.},
year = {2015},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25749340/},
}Cited By (109 papers)
- Non-ionizing radiation as possible carcinogenInfluential
Shiwangi Gupta et al. (2020) - 49 citations
- Are Exposures to Multiple Frequencies the Key to Future Radiofrequency Research?Influential
Z. Sienkiewicz et al. (2017) - 17 citations
- A Meta-Integrative Qualitative Study on the Hidden Threats of Smart Buildings/Cities and Their Associated Impacts on Humans and the EnvironmentInfluential
Reshna Raveendran, Kheira Anissa Tabet Aoul (2021) - 9 citations
- Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).
Unknown authors (2020) - 1,297 citations
- Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective.
D. Belpomme et al. (2018) - 177 citations
- Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
A. Miller et al. (2019) - 161 citations
- Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications?
A. Di Ciaula (2018) - 122 citations
- ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS OF 5G MOBILE NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY UNDER REAL-LIFE CONDITIONS.
R. Kostoff et al. (2020) - 111 citations
- Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation
M. Carlberg, L. Hardell (2017) - 100 citations
- ICNIRP GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ( 100 K H Z TO 300 GH Z )
Unknown authors (2020) - 77 citations