3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Are people living next to mobile phone base stations more strained? Relationship of health concerns, self-estimated distance to base station, and psychological parameters.

Bioeffects Seen

Augner C, Hacker GW. · 2009

View Original Abstract
Share:

People living within 100 meters of cell towers show measurably higher stress hormones and anxiety symptoms than those living farther away.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Austrian researchers studied 57 people who believed they lived close to cell phone towers to see if proximity affected their stress levels. Those who reported living within 100 meters of base stations showed significantly higher levels of stress hormones in their saliva and reported more anxiety, obsessive thoughts, and physical symptoms. The findings suggest that people near cell towers experience measurable biological stress, though the study couldn't determine whether this was due to actual electromagnetic field exposure or other factors.

Why This Matters

This research addresses a critical question in the EMF health debate: are the symptoms reported by people living near cell towers real or imagined? The study provides compelling evidence that these individuals show measurable biological markers of stress, including elevated alpha-amylase levels and multiple psychological strain indicators. What makes this particularly significant is that the stress response was documented through objective biomarkers, not just self-reported symptoms. The researchers acknowledge they couldn't determine whether actual EMF exposure or other factors caused these effects, but the biological reality of the stress response is clear. This study reinforces the need to take seriously the health concerns of communities living near wireless infrastructure, regardless of whether the mechanism is direct EMF exposure or other pathways.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

The aim of this study was to find out if people who believe that they live close to base stations show psychological or psychobiological differences that would indicate more strain or stress. Furthermore, we wanted to detect the relevant connections linking self-estimated distance between home and the next mobile phone base station (DBS), daily use of mobile phone (MPU), EMF-health concerns, electromagnetic hypersensitivity, and psychological strain parameters.

Fifty-seven participants completed standardized and non-standardized questionnaires that focused on ...

Self-declared base station neighbors (DBS ≤ 100 meters) had significantly higher concentrations of a...

We conclude that self-declared base station neighbors are more strained than others. EMF-related health concerns cannot explain these findings. Further research should identify if actual EMF exposure or other factors are responsible for these results.

Cite This Study
Augner C, Hacker GW. (2009). Are people living next to mobile phone base stations more strained? Relationship of health concerns, self-estimated distance to base station, and psychological parameters. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 13(3):141-145, 2009.
Show BibTeX
@article{c_2009_are_people_living_next_1852,
  author = {Augner C and Hacker GW.},
  title = {Are people living next to mobile phone base stations more strained? Relationship of health concerns, self-estimated distance to base station, and psychological parameters.},
  year = {2009},
  
  url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862447/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Austrian researchers studied 57 people who believed they lived close to cell phone towers to see if proximity affected their stress levels. Those who reported living within 100 meters of base stations showed significantly higher levels of stress hormones in their saliva and reported more anxiety, obsessive thoughts, and physical symptoms. The findings suggest that people near cell towers experience measurable biological stress, though the study couldn't determine whether this was due to actual electromagnetic field exposure or other factors.