3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

The Effects of Precautionary Messages about Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones and Base Stations Revisited: The Role of Recipient Characteristics.

Bioeffects Seen

Boehmert C, Wiedemann P, Pye J, Croft R. · 2016

View Original Abstract
Share:

Reading EMF health warnings doesn't increase anxiety, challenging claims that precautionary information creates harmful fear.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers studied how 298 university students responded to precautionary messages about EMF health risks from cell phones and cell towers. They found that people's anxiety levels and gender influenced how threatening they perceived these messages to be, but importantly, reading precautionary information didn't actually increase participants' anxiety or emotional distress. This challenges the common assumption that EMF health warnings automatically create fear in the public.

Why This Matters

This research addresses a critical question in EMF health communication: do precautionary messages about potential risks actually harm people by creating unnecessary anxiety? The science demonstrates that while individual factors like existing anxiety levels and gender influence how people perceive EMF risk messages, the messages themselves don't increase emotional distress. What this means for you is that seeking information about EMF health effects and protective measures isn't likely to create harmful anxiety, contrary to what some critics claim. The reality is that informed precaution based on scientific evidence represents rational decision-making, not fear-mongering. This study supports the position that people can handle nuanced information about potential EMF risks without becoming paralyzed by fear, reinforcing that education and awareness are valuable tools rather than sources of harm.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

The current study explored the interplay of variables on the side of message recipients with this effect. The individual difference variables of interest were gender, trait anxiety, personal need for structure, and personal fear of invalidity. Furthermore, the study determined whether the increased threat perception is accompanied by emotional distress.

A total of 298 university students answered a survey after reading either a basic text about RF-EMFs...

Regarding participants' emotional distress, we found no difference in state anxiety scores between t...

The findings show that the effects of precautionary messages on threat perception depend on individual difference variables such as recipients' trait anxiety and gender. Also, the fact that precautionary communication did not result in heightened state anxiety challenges the assumption that precautionary messages induce fear or anxiety.

Cite This Study
Boehmert C, Wiedemann P, Pye J, Croft R. (2016). The Effects of Precautionary Messages about Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones and Base Stations Revisited: The Role of Recipient Characteristics. Risk Anal. 2016 May 10. doi: 10.1111/risa.12634.
Show BibTeX
@article{c_2016_the_effects_of_precautionary_1916,
  author = {Boehmert C and Wiedemann P and Pye J and Croft R.},
  title = {The Effects of Precautionary Messages about Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones and Base Stations Revisited: The Role of Recipient Characteristics.},
  year = {2016},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27163281/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Researchers studied how 298 university students responded to precautionary messages about EMF health risks from cell phones and cell towers. They found that people's anxiety levels and gender influenced how threatening they perceived these messages to be, but importantly, reading precautionary information didn't actually increase participants' anxiety or emotional distress. This challenges the common assumption that EMF health warnings automatically create fear in the public.