8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro.

Bioeffects Seen

Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rudiger H. · 2005

View Original Abstract
Share:

Mobile phone radiation damaged DNA in human cells at everyday exposure levels without heating, challenging thermal-only safety standards.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed human cells and rat cells to 1800 MHz mobile phone radiation at levels similar to what phones emit during calls. After 16 hours of exposure, both cell types showed DNA strand breaks (damage to genetic material). The damage occurred at non-thermal levels, meaning it wasn't caused by heating effects, and intermittent exposure patterns caused more damage than continuous exposure.

Why This Matters

This study provides direct evidence that mobile phone radiation can break DNA strands in living cells at power levels similar to those emitted by phones during normal use. The SAR levels tested (1.2 and 2 W/kg) are within the range of typical mobile phone emissions, making these findings highly relevant to everyday exposure. What makes this research particularly significant is that the DNA damage occurred without heating the cells, challenging the wireless industry's long-held position that only thermal effects from EMF can cause biological harm. The finding that intermittent exposure caused more damage than continuous exposure also mirrors real-world phone usage patterns, where radiation pulses on and off during calls and data transmission. This adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting our current safety standards, which only account for heating effects, may be inadequate to protect against the biological impacts of wireless radiation.

Exposure Details

SAR
1.2, 2 W/kg
Source/Device
1800 MHz mobile phone radiation
Exposure Duration
5 min on/10 min off, for 4, 16 and 24 h

Exposure Context

This study used 1.2, 2 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 1.2, 2 W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the Extreme Concern rangeFCC limit is 1x higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 1.80 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 1.80 GHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

The aim of this project was to study the non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro.

Cultured human diploid fibroblasts and cultured rat granulosa cells were exposed to intermittent and...

RF-EMF exposure (1800 MHz; SAR 1.2 or 2 W/kg; different modulations; during 4, 16 and 24 h; intermit...

Therefore we conclude that the induced DNA damage cannot be based on thermal effects.

Cite This Study
Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rudiger H. (2005). Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutat Res. 583:178-183, 2005.
Show BibTeX
@article{e_2005_nonthermal_dna_breakage_by_35,
  author = {Diem E and Schwarz C and Adlkofer F and Jahn O and Rudiger H.},
  title = {Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro.},
  year = {2005},
  
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571805000896},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, a 2005 study found that 1800 MHz mobile phone radiation caused DNA single and double strand breaks in human fibroblasts after 16 hours of exposure. The damage occurred at non-thermal levels, meaning it wasn't caused by heating effects from the radiation.
Research shows intermittent 1800 MHz exposure (5 minutes on, 10 minutes off) caused stronger DNA damage than continuous exposure in both human and rat cells. The study found this pattern created more genetic damage than steady radiation exposure.
Yes, 1800 MHz mobile phone radiation damaged DNA in transformed rat granulosa cells (GFSH-R17) at non-thermal power levels. The study confirmed genetic damage occurred without heating effects, demonstrating biological impacts below thermal thresholds in reproductive cells.
DNA strand breaks from 1800 MHz mobile phone radiation appeared after 16 hours of exposure in both human fibroblasts and rat cells. The study tested 4, 16, and 24-hour exposures, with significant genetic damage detected at the 16-hour mark.
The 2005 study found that various mobile phone modulations at 1800 MHz all induced DNA strand breaks in cells. Different signal patterns and modulations consistently caused genetic damage, suggesting the frequency itself, rather than specific modulation types, drives the effect.