2100-MHz electromagnetic fields have different effects on visual evoked potentials and oxidant/antioxidant status depending on exposure duration.
Hidisoglu E, Kantar Gok D, Er H, Akpinar D, Uysal F, Akkoyunlu G, Ozen S, Agar A, Yargicoglu P. · 2016
View Original AbstractBrain protective responses to cell phone-level EMF exposure become harmful oxidative damage after prolonged exposure periods.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed rats to 2100-MHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to 3G cell phone signals) for 2 hours daily, comparing short-term (1 week) versus long-term (10 weeks) exposure. They found that short-term exposure actually improved brain function and antioxidant defenses, while long-term exposure caused brain dysfunction and oxidative damage. This suggests that duration of EMF exposure matters significantly for health effects.
Why This Matters
This study reveals a critical aspect of EMF research that's often overlooked: timing matters tremendously. The finding that short-term exposure at 0.57-0.95 W/kg SAR levels (comparable to heavy cell phone use) initially triggered protective responses, while prolonged exposure caused brain dysfunction, helps explain why EMF research can seem contradictory. The 2100-MHz frequency tested here is identical to 3G cellular networks that billions of people are exposed to daily. What this means for you is that the cumulative nature of EMF exposure may be more important than single-dose studies suggest. The research demonstrates that your brain's protective mechanisms can become overwhelmed with chronic exposure, leading to measurable changes in visual processing and cellular damage markers.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 0.57 and 0.95 W/kg
- Electric Field
- 27.15 and 35.2 V/m
- Source/Device
- 2100-MHz EMF
- Exposure Duration
- 2 h/day for 1 or 10 weeks
Exposure Context
This study used 27.15 and 35.2 V/m for electric fields:
- 90.5x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.3 V/m
This study used 0.57 and 0.95 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 1.4x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the duration effects of 2100-MHz electromagnetic field (EMF) on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and to assess lipid peroxidation (LPO), nitric oxide (NO) production and antioxidant status of EMF exposed rats.
Rats were randomized to following groups: Sham rats (S1 and S10) and rats exposed to 2100-MHz EMF (E...
Brain thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE) levels were si...
Consequently, it could be concluded that different effects of EMFs on VEPs depend on exposure duration. In addition, our results indicated that short-term EMF could provide protective effects, while long-term EMF could have an adverse effect on VEPs and oxidant/antioxidant status.
Show BibTeX
@article{e_2016_2100mhz_electromagnetic_fields_have_107,
author = {Hidisoglu E and Kantar Gok D and Er H and Akpinar D and Uysal F and Akkoyunlu G and Ozen S and Agar A and Yargicoglu P. },
title = {2100-MHz electromagnetic fields have different effects on visual evoked potentials and oxidant/antioxidant status depending on exposure duration.},
year = {2016},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006899316000317},
}