8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Radio Frequency

Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system.

Bioeffects Seen

Estenberg J, Augustsson T. · 2013

View Original Abstract
Share:

City dwellers face 150 times more radiofrequency radiation than rural residents, with cell towers creating dramatic exposure differences across communities.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Swedish researchers developed a mobile monitoring system to measure radiofrequency radiation levels across different environments, collecting over 70,000 measurements in rural, urban, and city areas. They found that radiation levels increased dramatically from rural to urban settings, with city areas showing 150 times higher exposure than rural areas. The study demonstrates how cell phone towers create significant differences in public RF exposure depending on where you live and work.

Why This Matters

This comprehensive mapping study reveals the stark reality of our modern electromagnetic environment. The 150-fold difference between rural and urban RF exposure levels shows just how dramatically our daily radiation dose varies by location. What's particularly significant is that cell phone base stations were identified as the dominant source in populated areas, meaning the infrastructure designed to keep us connected is creating a gradient of involuntary exposure across communities. The median city exposure of 2,400 µW/m² represents constant background radiation that simply didn't exist a generation ago. While these levels remain below current regulatory limits, this study provides crucial baseline data showing how pervasive RF has become in our daily environment, with urban dwellers experiencing substantially higher chronic exposure than their rural counterparts.

Exposure Details

Power Density
0.0000016, 0.000027, and 0.00024 µW/m²
Source/Device
30 MHz to 3 GHz

Exposure Context

This study used 0.0000016, 0.000027, and 0.00024 µW/m² for radio frequency:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0.0000016, 0.000027, and 0.00024 µW/m²Extreme Concern - 1,000 uW/m2FCC Limit - 10M uW/m2Effects observed in the No Concern rangeFCC limit is 6,250,000,000,000x higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 30 MHz - 3 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 30 MHz - 3 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

The aim of this study is to investigate Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system.

A novel, car based, measuring system for estimation of general public outdoor exposure to radiofrequ...

The median power density was 16 µW/m(2) in rural areas, 270 µW/m(2) in urban areas, and 2400 µW/m(2)...

Cite This Study
Estenberg J, Augustsson T. (2013). Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013 Dec 27. doi: 10.1002/bem.21830.
Show BibTeX
@article{j_2013_extensive_frequency_selective_measurements_966,
  author = {Estenberg J and Augustsson T.},
  title = {Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system.},
  year = {2013},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24375568/},
}
PubMed: 24375568

Cited By (41 papers)

Quick Questions About This Study

Swedish research found that radiofrequency radiation levels in city areas are 150 times higher than in rural areas. The study measured over 70,000 locations and found cell phone towers create dramatic exposure differences based on where you live and work.
Yes, urban areas have significantly higher radiofrequency exposure than rural locations. A comprehensive Swedish study found urban areas had 17 times higher RF radiation levels than rural areas, with cell phone base stations being the primary source of exposure.
Cell phone base stations are the dominant source of radiofrequency radiation in urban and city environments. Swedish researchers found these towers create radiation levels up to 150 times higher in cities compared to rural areas with fewer towers.
Yes, rural areas have dramatically lower radiofrequency radiation exposure than urban locations. Swedish measurements across 70,000 locations found rural areas had the lowest RF levels, with city areas showing 150 times higher exposure due to cell tower density.
Cell towers significantly increase radiofrequency radiation in surrounding neighborhoods. Swedish research demonstrated that areas with more cell phone base stations had up to 150 times higher RF exposure levels than areas with fewer towers.